[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Date: Tue, 6 Jun 2023 14:50:46 +0200
From: Maxime Chevallier <maxime.chevallier@...tlin.com>
To: "Russell King (Oracle)" <linux@...linux.org.uk>
Cc: Geert Uytterhoeven <geert@...ux-m68k.org>, davem@...emloft.net,
netdev@...r.kernel.org, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
alexis.lothore@...tlin.com, thomas.petazzoni@...tlin.com, Andrew Lunn
<andrew@...n.ch>, Jakub Kicinski <kuba@...nel.org>, Eric Dumazet
<edumazet@...gle.com>, Paolo Abeni <pabeni@...hat.com>, Florian Fainelli
<f.fainelli@...il.com>, Heiner Kallweit <hkallweit1@...il.com>, Vladimir
Oltean <vladimir.oltean@....com>, Ioana Ciornei <ioana.ciornei@....com>,
linux-stm32@...md-mailman.stormreply.com,
linux-arm-kernel@...ts.infradead.org, Maxime Coquelin
<mcoquelin.stm32@...il.com>, Jose Abreu <joabreu@...opsys.com>, Alexandre
Torgue <alexandre.torgue@...s.st.com>, Giuseppe Cavallaro
<peppe.cavallaro@...com>, Simon Horman <simon.horman@...igine.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH net-next 1/2] net: stmmac: Add PCS_LYNX as a dependency
for the whole driver
On Tue, 6 Jun 2023 11:44:08 +0100
"Russell King (Oracle)" <linux@...linux.org.uk> wrote:
> On Tue, Jun 06, 2023 at 12:35:23PM +0200, Geert Uytterhoeven wrote:
> > Hi Russell,
> >
> > > diff --git a/drivers/net/ethernet/stmicro/stmmac/stmmac_main.c b/drivers/net/ethernet/stmicro/stmmac/stmmac_main.c
> > > index fa07b0d50b46..1801f8cc8413 100644
> > > --- a/drivers/net/ethernet/stmicro/stmmac/stmmac_main.c
> > > +++ b/drivers/net/ethernet/stmicro/stmmac/stmmac_main.c
> > > @@ -940,9 +940,6 @@ static struct phylink_pcs *stmmac_mac_select_pcs(struct phylink_config *config,
> > > if (priv->hw->xpcs)
> > > return &priv->hw->xpcs->pcs;
> > >
> > > - if (priv->hw->lynx_pcs)
> > > - return priv->hw->lynx_pcs;
> > > -
> > > return NULL;
> > > }
> >
> > I think the above hunk is wrong, and should be replaced by a removal
> > of the call to lynx_pcs_destroy()?
>
> Indeed, and wrong file too. Thanks for spotting, I think we spotted
> the mistake at almost the same time. Replacement patch sent.
>
> It'd be good to have the patch thoroughly reviewed to make sure I
> haven't missed anything else, bearing in mind that I don't know this
> driver inside out and don't have the hardware.
I will give it a try righ-away,
Thanks,
Maxime
> Thanks.
>
Powered by blists - more mailing lists