lists.openwall.net   lists  /  announce  owl-users  owl-dev  john-users  john-dev  passwdqc-users  yescrypt  popa3d-users  /  oss-security  kernel-hardening  musl  sabotage  tlsify  passwords  /  crypt-dev  xvendor  /  Bugtraq  Full-Disclosure  linux-kernel  linux-netdev  linux-ext4  linux-hardening  linux-cve-announce  PHC 
Open Source and information security mailing list archives
 
Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.
[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <15c88e23-9a7f-4a8f-8337-8ab9d2485a18@lunn.ch>
Date: Wed, 7 Jun 2023 14:28:28 +0200
From: Andrew Lunn <andrew@...n.ch>
To: Manivannan Sadhasivam <manivannan.sadhasivam@...aro.org>
Cc: Loic Poulain <loic.poulain@...aro.org>, davem@...emloft.net,
	edumazet@...gle.com, kuba@...nel.org, pabeni@...hat.com,
	mhi@...ts.linux.dev, linux-arm-msm@...r.kernel.org,
	netdev@...r.kernel.org, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH 0/3] Add MHI Endpoint network driver

> > Yes, so there is already a drivers/net/wwan directory for this, in
> > which there are drivers for control and data path, that together
> > represent a given 'wwan' (modem) entity. So the generic mhi_net could
> > be moved there, but the point is AFAIU, that MHI, despite his name, is
> > not (more) used only for modem, but as a generic memory sharing based
> > transport protocol, such as virtio. It would then not be necessarily
> > true that a peripheral exposing MHI net channel is actually a modem?
> > 
> 
> Agree, mhi_*_net drivers can be used by non-modem devices too as long as they
> support MHI protocol.

O.K. I was just trying to avoid cluttering up the directory. But if
this is shared code, not actual drivers, this is fine.

Are there more features yet to be implemented? Would it make sense to
create a mhi directory?

       Andrew

Powered by blists - more mailing lists

Powered by Openwall GNU/*/Linux Powered by OpenVZ