[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20230606220117.0696be3e@kernel.org>
Date: Tue, 6 Jun 2023 22:01:17 -0700
From: Jakub Kicinski <kuba@...nel.org>
To: Saeed Mahameed <saeed@...nel.org>
Cc: "David S. Miller" <davem@...emloft.net>, Paolo Abeni
<pabeni@...hat.com>, Eric Dumazet <edumazet@...gle.com>, Saeed Mahameed
<saeedm@...dia.com>, netdev@...r.kernel.org, Tariq Toukan
<tariqt@...dia.com>, Leon Romanovsky <leonro@...dia.com>,
linux-rdma@...r.kernel.org, Jiri Pirko <jiri@...dia.com>
Subject: Re: [net-next 13/15] net/mlx5: Skip inline mode check after
mlx5_eswitch_enable_locked() failure
On Tue, 6 Jun 2023 00:12:17 -0700 Saeed Mahameed wrote:
> Fixes: bffaa916588e ("net/mlx5: E-Switch, Add control for inline mode")
> Fixes: 8c98ee77d911 ("net/mlx5e: E-Switch, Add extack messages to devlink callbacks")
The combination of net-next and Fixes is always odd.
Why?
Either it's important enough to be a fix or its not important
and can go to net-next...
Powered by blists - more mailing lists