lists.openwall.net   lists  /  announce  owl-users  owl-dev  john-users  john-dev  passwdqc-users  yescrypt  popa3d-users  /  oss-security  kernel-hardening  musl  sabotage  tlsify  passwords  /  crypt-dev  xvendor  /  Bugtraq  Full-Disclosure  linux-kernel  linux-netdev  linux-ext4  linux-hardening  linux-cve-announce  PHC 
Open Source and information security mailing list archives
 
Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.
[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Date: Thu, 8 Jun 2023 20:32:24 +0800
From: renmingshuai <renmingshuai@...wei.com>
To: <pctammela@...atatu.com>
CC: <caowangbao@...wei.com>, <davem@...emloft.net>, <edumazet@...gle.com>,
	<jhs@...atatu.com>, <jiri@...nulli.us>, <kuba@...nel.org>,
	<liaichun@...wei.com>, <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>, <liubo335@...wei.com>,
	<netdev@...r.kernel.org>, <pabeni@...hat.com>, <renmingshuai@...wei.com>,
	<xiyou.wangcong@...il.com>, <yanan@...wei.com>
Subject: [PATCH v2] net/sched: Set the flushing flags to false to prevent an infinite loop and add one test to tdc

>On 07/06/2023 01:19, renmingshuai wrote:
>>> On 06/06/2023 11:45, renmingshuai wrote:
>>>> When a new chain is added by using tc, one soft lockup alarm will
>>>> be
>>>>    generated after delete the prio 0 filter of the chain. To
>>>>    reproduce
>>>>    the problem, perform the following steps:
>>>> (1) tc qdisc add dev eth0 root handle 1: htb default 1
>>>> (2) tc chain add dev eth0
>>>> (3) tc filter del dev eth0 chain 0 parent 1: prio 0
>>>> (4) tc filter add dev eth0 chain 0 parent 1:
>>>
>>> This seems like it could be added to tdc or 3 and 4 must be run in
>>> parallel?
>> 3 and 4 do not need to be run inparallel. When a new chain is added
>> by the
>>   way as step 1 and the step 3 is completed, this problem always
>>   occurs
>>   whenever step 4 is run.
>
>Got it,
>The test still hangs with the provided patch.
>
>+ tc qdisc add dev lo root handle 1: htb default 1
>+ tc chain add dev lo
>+ tc filter del dev lo chain 0 parent 1: prio 0
>[   68.790030][ T6704] [+]
>[   68.790060][ T6704] chain refcnt 2
>[   68.790951][ T6704] [-]
>+ tc filter add dev lo chain 0 parent 1:
><hangs>
>
>Also please add this test to tdc, it should be straightforward.
>
Sorry for not testing before. I forgot that the chain->refcnt was
increased by 1 when tcf_chain_get() is called in tc_del_tfilter().
 The value of chain->refcnt is 2 after chain flush. The test
 result is as follows:
[root@...alhost ~]# tc qdisc add dev eth2 root handle 1: htb default 1
[root@...alhost ~]# tc chain add dev eth2
[root@...alhost ~]# tc filter del dev eth2 chain 0 parent 1: prio 0
[root@...alhost ~]# tc filter add dev eth2 chain 0 parent 1:
Error: Filter kind and protocol must be specified.
We have an error talking to the kernel

And I have add this test to tdc:
[root@...alhost tc-testing]# ./tdc.py -f tc-tests/filters/tests.json
ok 7 c2b4 - Adding a new fiter after deleting a filter in a chain does
not cause  an infinite loop

Fixes: 726d061286ce ("net: sched: prevent insertion of new classifiers during chain flush")
Signed-off-by: renmingshuai <renmingshuai@...wei.com>
---
 net/sched/cls_api.c                           |  7 +++++
 .../tc-testing/tc-tests/filters/tests.json    | 26 ++++++++++++++++---
 2 files changed, 30 insertions(+), 3 deletions(-)

diff --git a/net/sched/cls_api.c b/net/sched/cls_api.c
index 2621550bfddc..3ea054e03fbf 100644
--- a/net/sched/cls_api.c
+++ b/net/sched/cls_api.c
@@ -2442,6 +2442,13 @@ static int tc_del_tfilter(struct sk_buff *skb, struct nlmsghdr *n,
 		tfilter_notify_chain(net, skb, block, q, parent, n,
 				     chain, RTM_DELTFILTER, extack);
 		tcf_chain_flush(chain, rtnl_held);
+		/* Set the flushing flags to false to prevent an infinite loop
+		 * when a new filter is added.
+		 */
+		mutex_lock(&chain->filter_chain_lock);
+		if (chain->refcnt == 2)
+			chain->flushing = false;
+		mutex_unlock(&chain->filter_chain_lock);
 		err = 0;
 		goto errout;
 	}
diff --git a/tools/testing/selftests/tc-testing/tc-tests/filters/tests.json b/tools/testing/selftests/tc-testing/tc-tests/filters/tests.json
index 361235ad574b..f165ca091109 100644
--- a/tools/testing/selftests/tc-testing/tc-tests/filters/tests.json
+++ b/tools/testing/selftests/tc-testing/tc-tests/filters/tests.json
@@ -125,5 +125,25 @@
         "teardown": [
             "$TC qdisc del dev $DEV2 ingress"
         ]
+    },
+    {
+        "id": "c2b4",
+        "name": "Adding a new fiter after deleting a filter in a chain does not cause an infinite loop",
+        "category": [
+            "filter",
+            "prio"
+        ],
+        "setup": [
+            "$TC qdisc add dev $DEV1 root handle 1: htb default 1",
+            "$TC chain add dev $DEV1"
+        ],
+        "cmdUnderTest": "$TC filter del dev $DEV1 chain 0 parent 1: prio 0",
+        "expExitCode": "0",
+        "verifyCmd": "$TC filter add dev $DEV1 chain 0 parent 1:",
+        "matchPattern": "Error: Filter kind and protocol must be specified.",
+        "matchCount": "1",
+        "teardown": [
+            "$TC qdisc del dev $DEV1 root handle 1: htb default 1"
+        ]
     }
 ]
--
2.27.0
>>>>
>>>>
>>>> The refcnt of the chain added by step 2 is equal to 1. After step
>>>> 3,
>>>>    the flushing flag of the chain is set to true in the
>>>>    tcf_chain_flush()
>>>>    called by tc_del_tfilter() because the prio is 0. In this case,
>>>>    if
>>>>    we add a new filter to this chain, it will never succeed and try
>>>>    again
>>>>    and again because the refresh flash is always true and refcnt is
>>>>    1.
>>>>    A soft lock alarm is generated 20 seconds later.
>>>> The stack is show as below:
>>>>
>>>> Kernel panic - not syncing: softlockup: hung tasks
>>>> CPU: 2 PID: 3321861 Comm: tc Kdump: loaded Tainted: G
>>>> Hardware name: QEMU Standard PC (i440FX + PIIX, 1996)
>>>> Call Trace:
>>>>    <IRQ>
>>>>    dump_stack+0x57/0x6e
>>>>    panic+0x196/0x3ec
>>>>    watchdog_timer_fn.cold+0x16/0x5c
>>>>    __run_hrtimer+0x5e/0x190
>>>>    __hrtimer_run_queues+0x8a/0xe0
>>>>    hrtimer_interrupt+0x110/0x2c0
>>>>    ? irqtime_account_irq+0x49/0xf0
>>>>    __sysvec_apic_timer_interrupt+0x5f/0xe0
>>>>    asm_call_irq_on_stack+0x12/0x20
>>>>    </IRQ>
>>>>    sysvec_apic_timer_interrupt+0x72/0x80
>>>>    asm_sysvec_apic_timer_interrupt+0x12/0x20
>>>> RIP: 0010:mutex_lock+0x24/0x70
>>>> RSP: 0018:ffffa836004ab9a8 EFLAGS: 00000246
>>>> RAX: 0000000000000000 RBX: ffff95bb02d76700 RCX: 0000000000000000
>>>> RDX: ffff95bb27462100 RSI: 0000000000000000 RDI: ffff95ba5b527000
>>>> RBP: ffff95ba5b527000 R08: 0000000000000001 R09: ffffa836004abbb8
>>>> R10: 000000000000000f R11: 0000000000000000 R12: 0000000000000000
>>>> R13: ffff95ba5b527000 R14: ffffa836004abbb8 R15: 0000000000000001
>>>>    __tcf_chain_put+0x27/0x200
>>>>    tc_new_tfilter+0x5e8/0x810
>>>>    ? tc_setup_cb_add+0x210/0x210
>>>>    rtnetlink_rcv_msg+0x2e3/0x380
>>>>    ? rtnl_calcit.isra.0+0x120/0x120
>>>>    netlink_rcv_skb+0x50/0x100
>>>>    netlink_unicast+0x12d/0x1d0
>>>>    netlink_sendmsg+0x286/0x490
>>>>    sock_sendmsg+0x62/0x70
>>>>    ____sys_sendmsg+0x24c/0x2c0
>>>>    ? import_iovec+0x17/0x20
>>>>    ? sendmsg_copy_msghdr+0x80/0xa0
>>>>    ___sys_sendmsg+0x75/0xc0
>>>>    ? do_fault_around+0x118/0x160
>>>>    ? do_read_fault+0x68/0xf0
>>>>    ? __handle_mm_fault+0x3f9/0x6f0
>>>>    __sys_sendmsg+0x59/0xa0
>>>>    do_syscall_64+0x33/0x40
>>>>    entry_SYSCALL_64_after_hwframe+0x61/0xc6
>>>> RIP: 0033:0x7f96705b8247
>>>> RSP: 002b:00007ffe552e9dc8 EFLAGS: 00000246 ORIG_RAX:
>>>> 000000000000002e
>>>> RAX: ffffffffffffffda RBX: 0000000000000000 RCX: 00007f96705b8247
>>>> RDX: 0000000000000000 RSI: 00007ffe552e9e40 RDI: 0000000000000003
>>>> RBP: 0000000000000001 R08: 0000000000000001 R09: 0000558113f678b0
>>>> R10: 00007f967069ab00 R11: 0000000000000246 R12: 00000000647ea089
>>>> R13: 00007ffe552e9f30 R14: 0000000000000001 R15: 0000558113175f00
>>>>
>>>> To avoid this case, set chain->flushing to be false if the
>>>> chain->refcnt
>>>>    is 1 after flushing the chain when prio is 0.
>>>>
>>>> Fixes: 726d061286ce ("net: sched: prevent insertion of new
>>>> classifiers during chain flush")
>>>> Signed-off-by: Ren Mingshuai <renmingshuai@...wei.com>
>>>> ---
>>>>    net/sched/cls_api.c | 7 +++++++
>>>>    1 file changed, 7 insertions(+)
>>>>
>>>> diff --git a/net/sched/cls_api.c b/net/sched/cls_api.c
>>>> index 2621550bfddc..68be55d75831 100644
>>>> --- a/net/sched/cls_api.c
>>>> +++ b/net/sched/cls_api.c
>>>> @@ -2442,6 +2442,13 @@ static int tc_del_tfilter(struct sk_buff
>>>> *skb, struct nlmsghdr *n,
>>>>    		tfilter_notify_chain(net, skb, block, q, parent,
>>>>    		n,
>>>>    				     chain, RTM_DELTFILTER,
>>>>    				     extack);
>>>>    		tcf_chain_flush(chain, rtnl_held);
>>>> +		/* Set the flushing flags to false to prevent an
>>>> infinite loop
>>>> +		 * when a new filter is added.
>>>> +		 */
>>>> +		mutex_lock(&chain->filter_chain_lock);
>>>> +		if (chain->refcnt == 1)
>>>> +			chain->flushing = false;
>>>> +		mutex_unlock(&chain->filter_chain_lock);
>>>>    		err = 0;
>>>>    		goto errout;
>>>>    	}

Powered by blists - more mailing lists

Powered by Openwall GNU/*/Linux Powered by OpenVZ