netdev - Re: [RFC PATCH 1/1] vsprintf: Warn on integer scanning overflows

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <ZIIAnhriitHDR2Vq@smile.fi.intel.com>
Date: Thu, 8 Jun 2023 19:23:58 +0300
From: Andy Shevchenko <andriy.shevchenko@...ux.intel.com>
To: Richard Weinberger <richard@....at>
Cc: linux-hardening <linux-hardening@...r.kernel.org>,
	netdev <netdev@...r.kernel.org>,
	linux-kernel <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
	Kees Cook <keescook@...omium.org>, Petr Mladek <pmladek@...e.com>,
	Steven Rostedt <rostedt@...dmis.org>,
	senozhatsky <senozhatsky@...omium.org>,
	Rasmus Villemoes <linux@...musvillemoes.dk>,
	davem <davem@...emloft.net>, edumazet <edumazet@...gle.com>,
	kuba <kuba@...nel.org>, pabeni <pabeni@...hat.com>,
	Miguel Ojeda <ojeda@...nel.org>,
	Alex Gaynor <alex.gaynor@...il.com>,
	Wedson Almeida Filho <wedsonaf@...il.com>,
	Boqun Feng <boqun.feng@...il.com>, Gary Guo <gary@...yguo.net>,
	Björn Roy Baron <bjorn3_gh@...tonmail.com>,
	Benno Lossin <benno.lossin@...ton.me>,
	Alexei Starovoitov <ast@...nel.org>,
	Daniel Borkmann <daniel@...earbox.net>,
	Jesper Dangaard Brouer <hawk@...nel.org>,
	John Fastabend <john.fastabend@...il.com>
Subject: Re: [RFC PATCH 1/1] vsprintf: Warn on integer scanning overflows

On Thu, Jun 08, 2023 at 06:14:33PM +0200, Richard Weinberger wrote:
> ----- Ursprüngliche Mail -----
> > Von: "Andy Shevchenko" <andriy.shevchenko@...ux.intel.com>
> >>  	if (prefix_chars < max_chars) {
> >>  		rv = _parse_integer_limit(cp, base, &result, max_chars - prefix_chars);
> >> +		WARN_ON_ONCE(rv & KSTRTOX_OVERFLOW);
> > 
> > This seems incorrect. simple_strto*() are okay to overflow. It's by design.
> 
> Is this design decision also known to all users of scanf functions in the kernel?

We have test_scanf.c. Does it miss any test cases? Please add them!

-- 
With Best Regards,
Andy Shevchenko