[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20230608185142.7372e7b6@gandalf.local.home>
Date: Thu, 8 Jun 2023 18:51:42 -0400
From: Steven Rostedt <rostedt@...dmis.org>
To: Masami Hiramatsu <mhiramat@...nel.org>
Cc: Jiri Olsa <jolsa@...nel.org>, Alexei Starovoitov <ast@...nel.org>,
Andrii Nakryiko <andrii.nakryiko@...il.com>, Daniel Borkmann
<daniel@...earbox.net>, Andrii Nakryiko <andrii@...nel.org>,
netdev@...r.kernel.org, bpf@...r.kernel.org, lkml
<linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>, Martin KaFai Lau <kafai@...com>, Song Liu
<songliubraving@...com>, Yonghong Song <yhs@...com>, John Fastabend
<john.fastabend@...il.com>, KP Singh <kpsingh@...omium.org>, "Naveen N .
Rao" <naveen.n.rao@...ux.ibm.com>, Anil S Keshavamurthy
<anil.s.keshavamurthy@...el.com>, "David S . Miller" <davem@...emloft.net>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v12 bpf-next 02/12] fprobe: Add ftrace based probe APIs
On Tue, 15 Mar 2022 23:00:38 +0900
Masami Hiramatsu <mhiramat@...nel.org> wrote:
> +static void fprobe_init(struct fprobe *fp)
> +{
> + fp->nmissed = 0;
> + fp->ops.func = fprobe_handler;
> + fp->ops.flags |= FTRACE_OPS_FL_SAVE_REGS;
> +}
> +
Masami,
I thought one of the advantages of fprobes over kprobes was that it did not
need to use SAVE_REGS, as that causes more overhead than SAVE_ARGS?
If fprobes uses save regs, what is the advantage of it over kprobes?
-- Steve
Powered by blists - more mailing lists