[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <CANn89iJb9zug7u1B042GM3XJ2T_4M0mmfz6Rhy41QvvGoBMKPg@mail.gmail.com>
Date: Sat, 10 Jun 2023 03:37:31 +0200
From: Eric Dumazet <edumazet@...gle.com>
To: Stephen Hemminger <stephen@...workplumber.org>
Cc: Mike Freemon <mfreemon@...udflare.com>, netdev@...r.kernel.org,
kernel-team@...udflare.com
Subject: Re: [PATCH net-next v3] tcp: enforce receive buffer memory limits by
allowing the tcp window to shrink
On Sat, Jun 10, 2023 at 2:42 AM Stephen Hemminger
<stephen@...workplumber.org> wrote:
>
> On Fri, 9 Jun 2023 15:47:06 -0500
> Mike Freemon <mfreemon@...udflare.com> wrote:
>
> > + {
> > + .procname = "tcp_shrink_window",
> > + .data = &init_net.ipv4.sysctl_tcp_shrink_window,
> > + .maxlen = sizeof(u8),
> > + .mode = 0644,
> > + .proc_handler = proc_dou8vec_minmax,
> > + .extra1 = SYSCTL_ZERO,
> > + .extra2 = SYSCTL_ONE,
> > + },
>
> NAK on introducing another sysctl.
We respectfully disagree.
A sysctl makes a lot of sense to us, as it allows us to not break many
packetdrill tests.
Powered by blists - more mailing lists