netdev - Re: [PATCH net-next 08/30] net: dsa: mt7530: change p{5,6}_interface to p{5,6}

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Date: Sat, 10 Jun 2023 20:55:53 +0300
From: Vladimir Oltean <olteanv@...il.com>
To: Arınç ÜNAL <arinc.unal@...nc9.com>
Cc: "Russell King (Oracle)" <linux@...linux.org.uk>,
	Sean Wang <sean.wang@...iatek.com>,
	Landen Chao <Landen.Chao@...iatek.com>,
	DENG Qingfang <dqfext@...il.com>,
	Daniel Golle <daniel@...rotopia.org>, Andrew Lunn <andrew@...n.ch>,
	Florian Fainelli <f.fainelli@...il.com>,
	"David S. Miller" <davem@...emloft.net>,
	Eric Dumazet <edumazet@...gle.com>,
	Jakub Kicinski <kuba@...nel.org>, Paolo Abeni <pabeni@...hat.com>,
	Matthias Brugger <matthias.bgg@...il.com>,
	AngeloGioacchino Del Regno <angelogioacchino.delregno@...labora.com>,
	Richard van Schagen <richard@...terhints.com>,
	Richard van Schagen <vschagen@...com>,
	Frank Wunderlich <frank-w@...lic-files.de>,
	Bartel Eerdekens <bartel.eerdekens@...stell8.be>,
	erkin.bozoglu@...ont.com, mithat.guner@...ont.com,
	netdev@...r.kernel.org, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
	linux-arm-kernel@...ts.infradead.org,
	linux-mediatek@...ts.infradead.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH net-next 08/30] net: dsa: mt7530: change p{5,6}_interface
 to p{5,6}_configured

On Sat, Jun 10, 2023 at 01:57:27PM +0300, Arınç ÜNAL wrote:
> I was able to confirm all user ports of the MT7531BE switch transmit/receive
> traffic to/from the SGMII CPU port and computer fine after getting rid of
> priv->info->cpu_port_config().
> 
> Tried all user ports being affine to the RGMII CPU port, that works too.
> 
> https://github.com/arinc9/linux/commit/4e79313a95d45950cab526456ef0030286ba4d4e

Did you do black-box testing after removing the code, or were you
also able to independently confirm that the configurations done by
cpu_port_config() were later overwritten? I'm trying to disambiguate
between "works by coincidence" and "works because the analysis was
correct".