netdev - [PATCH net-next 07/10] mlxsw: spectrum_router: Extract a helper to free a RIF

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite for Android: free password hash cracker in your pocket

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <a6694562a0a4e6dc76ec553763b5e82691de127d.1686581444.git.petrm@nvidia.com>
Date: Mon, 12 Jun 2023 17:31:06 +0200
From: Petr Machata <petrm@...dia.com>
To: "David S. Miller" <davem@...emloft.net>, Eric Dumazet
	<edumazet@...gle.com>, Jakub Kicinski <kuba@...nel.org>, Paolo Abeni
	<pabeni@...hat.com>, <netdev@...r.kernel.org>
CC: Ido Schimmel <idosch@...dia.com>, Petr Machata <petrm@...dia.com>, "Amit
 Cohen" <amcohen@...dia.com>, <mlxsw@...dia.com>
Subject: [PATCH net-next 07/10] mlxsw: spectrum_router: Extract a helper to free a RIF

Right now freeing the object that mlxsw uses to keep track of a RIF is as
simple as calling a kfree. But later on as CRIF abstraction is brought in,
it will involve severing the link between CRIF and its RIF as well. Better
to have the logic encapsulated in a helper.

Since a helper is being introduced, make it a full-fledged destructor and
have it validate that the objects tracked at the RIF have been released.

Signed-off-by: Petr Machata <petrm@...dia.com>
Reviewed-by: Amit Cohen <amcohen@...dia.com>
---
 .../net/ethernet/mellanox/mlxsw/spectrum_router.c | 15 +++++++++++----
 1 file changed, 11 insertions(+), 4 deletions(-)

diff --git a/drivers/net/ethernet/mellanox/mlxsw/spectrum_router.c b/drivers/net/ethernet/mellanox/mlxsw/spectrum_router.c
index e05c47568ece..1e05ecd29c8d 100644
--- a/drivers/net/ethernet/mellanox/mlxsw/spectrum_router.c
+++ b/drivers/net/ethernet/mellanox/mlxsw/spectrum_router.c
@@ -7903,6 +7903,13 @@ static struct mlxsw_sp_rif *mlxsw_sp_rif_alloc(size_t rif_size, u16 rif_index,
 	return rif;
 }
 
+static void mlxsw_sp_rif_free(struct mlxsw_sp_rif *rif)
+{
+	WARN_ON(!list_empty(&rif->neigh_list));
+	WARN_ON(!list_empty(&rif->nexthop_list));
+	kfree(rif);
+}
+
 struct mlxsw_sp_rif *mlxsw_sp_rif_by_index(const struct mlxsw_sp *mlxsw_sp,
 					   u16 rif_index)
 {
@@ -8209,7 +8216,7 @@ mlxsw_sp_rif_create(struct mlxsw_sp *mlxsw_sp,
 err_fid_get:
 	mlxsw_sp->router->rifs[rif_index] = NULL;
 	dev_put(params->dev);
-	kfree(rif);
+	mlxsw_sp_rif_free(rif);
 err_rif_alloc:
 	mlxsw_sp_rif_index_free(mlxsw_sp, rif_index, rif_entries);
 err_rif_index_alloc:
@@ -8249,7 +8256,7 @@ static void mlxsw_sp_rif_destroy(struct mlxsw_sp_rif *rif)
 		mlxsw_sp_fid_put(fid);
 	mlxsw_sp->router->rifs[rif->rif_index] = NULL;
 	dev_put(dev);
-	kfree(rif);
+	mlxsw_sp_rif_free(rif);
 	mlxsw_sp_rif_index_free(mlxsw_sp, rif_index, rif_entries);
 	vr->rif_count--;
 	mlxsw_sp_vr_put(mlxsw_sp, vr);
@@ -9902,7 +9909,7 @@ mlxsw_sp_ul_rif_create(struct mlxsw_sp *mlxsw_sp, struct mlxsw_sp_vr *vr,
 
 ul_rif_op_err:
 	mlxsw_sp->router->rifs[rif_index] = NULL;
-	kfree(ul_rif);
+	mlxsw_sp_rif_free(ul_rif);
 err_rif_alloc:
 	mlxsw_sp_rif_index_free(mlxsw_sp, rif_index, rif_entries);
 	return ERR_PTR(err);
@@ -9917,7 +9924,7 @@ static void mlxsw_sp_ul_rif_destroy(struct mlxsw_sp_rif *ul_rif)
 	atomic_sub(rif_entries, &mlxsw_sp->router->rifs_count);
 	mlxsw_sp_rif_ipip_lb_ul_rif_op(ul_rif, false);
 	mlxsw_sp->router->rifs[ul_rif->rif_index] = NULL;
-	kfree(ul_rif);
+	mlxsw_sp_rif_free(ul_rif);
 	mlxsw_sp_rif_index_free(mlxsw_sp, rif_index, rif_entries);
 }
 
-- 
2.40.1