[<prev] [next>] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20230612205428.1780-1-edward.cree@amd.com>
Date: Mon, 12 Jun 2023 21:54:28 +0100
From: <edward.cree@....com>
To: <linux-net-drivers@....com>, <davem@...emloft.net>, <kuba@...nel.org>,
<pabeni@...hat.com>, <edumazet@...gle.com>
CC: Edward Cree <ecree.xilinx@...il.com>, <netdev@...r.kernel.org>,
<habetsm.xilinx@...il.com>, <oe-kbuild-all@...ts.linux.dev>,
<simon.horman@...igine.com>, kernel test robot <lkp@...el.com>
Subject: [PATCH net-next] sfc: do not try to call tc functions when CONFIG_SFC_SRIOV=n
From: Edward Cree <ecree.xilinx@...il.com>
Functions efx_tc_netdev_event and efx_tc_netevent_event do not exist
in that case as object files tc_bindings.o and tc_encap_actions.o
are not built, so the calls to them from ef100_netdev_event and
ef100_netevent_event cause link errors.
Guard the relevant part of ef100_netdev_event with #ifdef, as well as
the entire function ef100_netevent_event and the code that registers
and unregisters the netevent notifier.
Also guard the includes of tc_bindings.h and tc_encap_actions.h into
ef100_netdev.c, as the symbols from these headers are only available
when the corresponding object files are built.
Reported-by: kernel test robot <lkp@...el.com>
Closes: https://lore.kernel.org/oe-kbuild-all/202306102026.ISK5JfUQ-lkp@intel.com/
Fixes: 7e5e7d800011 ("sfc: neighbour lookup for TC encap action offload")
Signed-off-by: Edward Cree <ecree.xilinx@...il.com>
---
drivers/net/ethernet/sfc/ef100_netdev.c | 13 +++++++++++--
1 file changed, 11 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-)
diff --git a/drivers/net/ethernet/sfc/ef100_netdev.c b/drivers/net/ethernet/sfc/ef100_netdev.c
index 7f7d560cb2b4..3bb0442de7ea 100644
--- a/drivers/net/ethernet/sfc/ef100_netdev.c
+++ b/drivers/net/ethernet/sfc/ef100_netdev.c
@@ -23,8 +23,10 @@
#include "mcdi_filters.h"
#include "rx_common.h"
#include "ef100_sriov.h"
+#ifdef CONFIG_SFC_SRIOV
#include "tc_bindings.h"
#include "tc_encap_actions.h"
+#endif
#include "efx_devlink.h"
static void ef100_update_name(struct efx_nic *efx)
@@ -301,22 +303,27 @@ int ef100_netdev_event(struct notifier_block *this,
{
struct efx_nic *efx = container_of(this, struct efx_nic, netdev_notifier);
struct net_device *net_dev = netdev_notifier_info_to_dev(ptr);
+#ifdef CONFIG_SFC_SRIOV
struct ef100_nic_data *nic_data = efx->nic_data;
int err;
+#endif
if (efx->net_dev == net_dev &&
(event == NETDEV_CHANGENAME || event == NETDEV_REGISTER))
ef100_update_name(efx);
+#ifdef CONFIG_SFC_SRIOV
if (!nic_data->grp_mae)
return NOTIFY_DONE;
err = efx_tc_netdev_event(efx, event, net_dev);
if (err & NOTIFY_STOP_MASK)
return err;
+#endif
return NOTIFY_DONE;
}
+#ifdef CONFIG_SFC_SRIOV
static int ef100_netevent_event(struct notifier_block *this,
unsigned long event, void *ptr)
{
@@ -329,9 +336,9 @@ static int ef100_netevent_event(struct notifier_block *this,
err = efx_tc_netevent_event(efx, event, ptr);
if (err & NOTIFY_STOP_MASK)
return err;
-
return NOTIFY_DONE;
};
+#endif
static int ef100_register_netdev(struct efx_nic *efx)
{
@@ -392,8 +399,8 @@ void ef100_remove_netdev(struct efx_probe_data *probe_data)
rtnl_unlock();
unregister_netdevice_notifier(&efx->netdev_notifier);
- unregister_netevent_notifier(&efx->netevent_notifier);
#if defined(CONFIG_SFC_SRIOV)
+ unregister_netevent_notifier(&efx->netevent_notifier);
if (!efx->type->is_vf)
efx_ef100_pci_sriov_disable(efx, true);
#endif
@@ -513,6 +520,7 @@ int ef100_probe_netdev(struct efx_probe_data *probe_data)
goto fail;
}
+#ifdef CONFIG_SFC_SRIOV
efx->netevent_notifier.notifier_call = ef100_netevent_event;
rc = register_netevent_notifier(&efx->netevent_notifier);
if (rc) {
@@ -520,6 +528,7 @@ int ef100_probe_netdev(struct efx_probe_data *probe_data)
"Failed to register netevent notifier, rc=%d\n", rc);
goto fail;
}
+#endif
efx_probe_devlink_unlock(efx);
return rc;
Powered by blists - more mailing lists