[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <ZIh0e5b/xp6H85pN@nanopsycho>
Date: Tue, 13 Jun 2023 15:51:55 +0200
From: Jiri Pirko <jiri@...nulli.us>
To: Petr Oros <poros@...hat.com>
Cc: Arkadiusz Kubalewski <arkadiusz.kubalewski@...el.com>, kuba@...nel.org,
vadfed@...a.com, jonathan.lemon@...il.com, pabeni@...hat.com,
corbet@....net, davem@...emloft.net, edumazet@...gle.com,
vadfed@...com, jesse.brandeburg@...el.com,
anthony.l.nguyen@...el.com, saeedm@...dia.com, leon@...nel.org,
richardcochran@...il.com, sj@...nel.org, javierm@...hat.com,
ricardo.canuelo@...labora.com, mst@...hat.com, tzimmermann@...e.de,
michal.michalik@...el.com, gregkh@...uxfoundation.org,
jacek.lawrynowicz@...ux.intel.com, airlied@...hat.com,
ogabbay@...nel.org, arnd@...db.de, nipun.gupta@....com,
axboe@...nel.dk, linux@...y.sk, masahiroy@...nel.org,
benjamin.tissoires@...hat.com, geert+renesas@...der.be,
milena.olech@...el.com, kuniyu@...zon.com, liuhangbin@...il.com,
hkallweit1@...il.com, andy.ren@...cruise.com, razor@...ckwall.org,
idosch@...dia.com, lucien.xin@...il.com, nicolas.dichtel@...nd.com,
phil@....cc, claudiajkang@...il.com, linux-doc@...r.kernel.org,
linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, netdev@...r.kernel.org,
intel-wired-lan@...ts.osuosl.org, linux-rdma@...r.kernel.org,
linux-arm-kernel@...ts.infradead.org, mschmidt@...hat.com,
linux-clk@...r.kernel.org, vadim.fedorenko@...ux.dev,
Jiri Pirko <jiri@...dia.com>
Subject: Re: [RFC PATCH v8 06/10] netdev: expose DPLL pin handle for netdevice
Mon, Jun 12, 2023 at 11:17:23AM CEST, poros@...hat.com wrote:
>Arkadiusz Kubalewski píše v Pá 09. 06. 2023 v 14:18 +0200:
>> From: Jiri Pirko <jiri@...dia.com>
[...]
>> +static size_t rtnl_dpll_pin_size(const struct net_device *dev)
>> +{
>> + size_t size = nla_total_size(0); /* nest IFLA_DPLL_PIN */
>> +
>> + if (dev->dpll_pin)
>> + size += dpll_msg_pin_handle_size(dev->dpll_pin);
>
>Hi Arkadiusz,
>
>net_device->dpll_pin is only valid if IS_ENABLED(CONFIG_DPLL)
>But the code in net/core/rtnetlink.c doesn't respect that.
>If CONFIG_DPLL is not set, net/core/rtnetlink.c cannot be compiled.
>
>Regards,
>Petr
You are correct. Here's the squash-patch to fix this. Arkadiusz, could
you please make the squash? Thanks!
diff --git a/drivers/dpll/dpll_netlink.c b/drivers/dpll/dpll_netlink.c
index e6efc17aaf26..00dc96c3ade4 100644
--- a/drivers/dpll/dpll_netlink.c
+++ b/drivers/dpll/dpll_netlink.c
@@ -303,12 +303,14 @@ dpll_cmd_pin_fill_details(struct sk_buff *msg, struct dpll_pin *pin,
size_t dpll_msg_pin_handle_size(struct dpll_pin *pin)
{
- return nla_total_size(4); /* DPLL_A_PIN_ID */
+ return pin ? nla_total_size(4) : 0; /* DPLL_A_PIN_ID */
}
EXPORT_SYMBOL_GPL(dpll_msg_pin_handle_size);
int dpll_msg_add_pin_handle(struct sk_buff *msg, struct dpll_pin *pin)
{
+ if (!pin)
+ return 0;
if (nla_put_u32(msg, DPLL_A_PIN_ID, pin->id))
return -EMSGSIZE;
return 0;
diff --git a/include/linux/netdevice.h b/include/linux/netdevice.h
index b002e3cc9943..82ad12fd4266 100644
--- a/include/linux/netdevice.h
+++ b/include/linux/netdevice.h
@@ -3967,6 +3967,16 @@ int dev_get_port_parent_id(struct net_device *dev,
bool netdev_port_same_parent_id(struct net_device *a, struct net_device *b);
void netdev_dpll_pin_set(struct net_device *dev, struct dpll_pin *dpll_pin);
void netdev_dpll_pin_clear(struct net_device *dev);
+
+static inline struct dpll_pin *netdev_dpll_pin(const struct net_device *dev)
+{
+#if IS_ENABLED(CONFIG_DPLL)
+ return dev->dpll_pin;
+#else
+ return NULL;
+#endif
+}
+
struct sk_buff *validate_xmit_skb_list(struct sk_buff *skb, struct net_device *dev, bool *again);
struct sk_buff *dev_hard_start_xmit(struct sk_buff *skb, struct net_device *dev,
struct netdev_queue *txq, int *ret);
diff --git a/net/core/rtnetlink.c b/net/core/rtnetlink.c
index ebe9ae8608fc..67dd455e15c7 100644
--- a/net/core/rtnetlink.c
+++ b/net/core/rtnetlink.c
@@ -1056,8 +1056,7 @@ static size_t rtnl_dpll_pin_size(const struct net_device *dev)
{
size_t size = nla_total_size(0); /* nest IFLA_DPLL_PIN */
- if (dev->dpll_pin)
- size += dpll_msg_pin_handle_size(dev->dpll_pin);
+ size += dpll_msg_pin_handle_size(netdev_dpll_pin(dev));
return size;
}
@@ -1790,11 +1789,9 @@ static int rtnl_fill_dpll_pin(struct sk_buff *skb,
if (!dpll_pin_nest)
return -EMSGSIZE;
- if (dev->dpll_pin) {
- ret = dpll_msg_add_pin_handle(skb, dev->dpll_pin);
- if (ret < 0)
- goto nest_cancel;
- }
+ ret = dpll_msg_add_pin_handle(skb, netdev_dpll_pin(dev));
+ if (ret < 0)
+ goto nest_cancel;
nla_nest_end(skb, dpll_pin_nest);
return 0;
Powered by blists - more mailing lists