netdev - Re: [RFC PATCH v8 03/10] dpll: core: Add DPLL framework base functions

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <20230612164515.6eacefb1@kernel.org>
Date: Mon, 12 Jun 2023 16:45:15 -0700
From: Jakub Kicinski <kuba@...nel.org>
To: Arkadiusz Kubalewski <arkadiusz.kubalewski@...el.com>
Cc: jiri@...nulli.us, vadfed@...a.com, jonathan.lemon@...il.com,
 pabeni@...hat.com, corbet@....net, davem@...emloft.net,
 edumazet@...gle.com, vadfed@...com, jesse.brandeburg@...el.com,
 anthony.l.nguyen@...el.com, saeedm@...dia.com, leon@...nel.org,
 richardcochran@...il.com, sj@...nel.org, javierm@...hat.com,
 ricardo.canuelo@...labora.com, mst@...hat.com, tzimmermann@...e.de,
 michal.michalik@...el.com, gregkh@...uxfoundation.org,
 jacek.lawrynowicz@...ux.intel.com, airlied@...hat.com, ogabbay@...nel.org,
 arnd@...db.de, nipun.gupta@....com, axboe@...nel.dk, linux@...y.sk,
 masahiroy@...nel.org, benjamin.tissoires@...hat.com,
 geert+renesas@...der.be, milena.olech@...el.com, kuniyu@...zon.com,
 liuhangbin@...il.com, hkallweit1@...il.com, andy.ren@...cruise.com,
 razor@...ckwall.org, idosch@...dia.com, lucien.xin@...il.com,
 nicolas.dichtel@...nd.com, phil@....cc, claudiajkang@...il.com,
 linux-doc@...r.kernel.org, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
 netdev@...r.kernel.org, intel-wired-lan@...ts.osuosl.org,
 linux-rdma@...r.kernel.org, linux-arm-kernel@...ts.infradead.org,
 poros@...hat.com, mschmidt@...hat.com, linux-clk@...r.kernel.org,
 vadim.fedorenko@...ux.dev
Subject: Re: [RFC PATCH v8 03/10] dpll: core: Add DPLL framework base
 functions

On Fri,  9 Jun 2023 14:18:46 +0200 Arkadiusz Kubalewski wrote:
> +	xa_for_each(xa_pins, i, ref) {
> +		if (ref->pin != pin)
> +			continue;
> +		reg = dpll_pin_registration_find(ref, ops, priv);
> +		if (reg) {
> +			refcount_inc(&ref->refcount);
> +			return 0;
> +		}
> +		ref_exists = true;
> +		break;
> +	}
> +
> +	if (!ref_exists) {
> +		ref = kzalloc(sizeof(*ref), GFP_KERNEL);
> +		if (!ref)
> +			return -ENOMEM;
> +		ref->pin = pin;
> +		INIT_LIST_HEAD(&ref->registration_list);
> +		ret = xa_insert(xa_pins, pin->pin_idx, ref, GFP_KERNEL);
> +		if (ret) {
> +			kfree(ref);
> +			return ret;
> +		}
> +		refcount_set(&ref->refcount, 1);
> +	}
> +
> +	reg = kzalloc(sizeof(*reg), GFP_KERNEL);

Why do we have two structures - ref and reg?

> +	if (!reg) {
> +		if (!ref_exists)
> +			kfree(ref);

ref has already been inserted into xa_pins

> +		return -ENOMEM;