[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <ZIm8kK7plae8CLvV@corigine.com>
Date: Wed, 14 Jun 2023 15:11:44 +0200
From: Simon Horman <simon.horman@...igine.com>
To: Vladimir Oltean <vladimir.oltean@....com>
Cc: netdev@...r.kernel.org, "David S. Miller" <davem@...emloft.net>,
Eric Dumazet <edumazet@...gle.com>,
Jakub Kicinski <kuba@...nel.org>, Paolo Abeni <pabeni@...hat.com>,
Jamal Hadi Salim <jhs@...atatu.com>,
Cong Wang <xiyou.wangcong@...il.com>, Jiri Pirko <jiri@...nulli.us>,
Vinicius Costa Gomes <vinicius.gomes@...el.com>,
linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, intel-wired-lan@...ts.osuosl.org,
Muhammad Husaini Zulkifli <muhammad.husaini.zulkifli@...el.com>,
Peilin Ye <yepeilin.cs@...il.com>,
Pedro Tammela <pctammela@...atatu.com>,
Richard Cochran <richardcochran@...il.com>,
Zhengchao Shao <shaozhengchao@...wei.com>,
Maxim Georgiev <glipus@...il.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v2 net-next 6/9] net: netdevsim: create a mock-up PTP
Hardware Clock driver
On Wed, Jun 14, 2023 at 12:54:37AM +0300, Vladimir Oltean wrote:
Hi Vladimir,
some minor feedback from my side.
...
> diff --git a/drivers/net/netdevsim/netdev.c b/drivers/net/netdevsim/netdev.c
> index 35fa1ca98671..58cd51de5b79 100644
> --- a/drivers/net/netdevsim/netdev.c
> +++ b/drivers/net/netdevsim/netdev.c
> @@ -291,13 +291,19 @@ static void nsim_setup(struct net_device *dev)
>
> static int nsim_init_netdevsim(struct netdevsim *ns)
> {
> + struct mock_phc *phc;
> int err;
>
> + phc = mock_phc_create(&ns->nsim_bus_dev->dev);
> + if (IS_ERR(phc))
> + return PTR_ERR(phc);
> +
> + ns->phc = phc;
> ns->netdev->netdev_ops = &nsim_netdev_ops;
>
> err = nsim_udp_tunnels_info_create(ns->nsim_dev, ns->netdev);
> if (err)
> - return err;
> + goto err_phc_destroy;
>
> rtnl_lock();
> err = nsim_bpf_init(ns);
...
> diff --git a/drivers/ptp/ptp_mock.c b/drivers/ptp/ptp_mock.c
> new file mode 100644
> index 000000000000..e09e6009c4f7
> --- /dev/null
> +++ b/drivers/ptp/ptp_mock.c
> @@ -0,0 +1,175 @@
> +// SPDX-License-Identifier: GPL-2.0-or-later
> +/*
> + * Copyright 2023 NXP
> + *
> + * Mock-up PTP Hardware Clock driver for virtual network devices
> + *
> + * Create a PTP clock which offers PTP time manipulation operations
> + * using a timecounter/cyclecounter on top of CLOCK_MONOTONIC_RAW.
> + */
> +
> +#include <linux/ptp_clock_kernel.h>
> +#include <linux/ptp_mock.h>
> +#include <linux/timecounter.h>
> +
> +/* Clamp scaled_ppm between -2,097,152,000 and 2,097,152,000,
> + * and thus "adj" between -68,719,476 and 68,719,476
> + */
> +#define MOCK_PHC_MAX_ADJ_PPB 32000000
> +/* Timestamps from ktime_get_raw() have 1 ns resolution, so the scale factor
> + * (MULT >> SHIFT) needs to be 1. Pick SHIFT as 31 bits, which translates
> + * MULT(freq 0) into 0x80000000.
> + */
> +#define MOCK_PHC_CC_SHIFT 31
> +#define MOCK_PHC_CC_MULT (1 << MOCK_PHC_CC_SHIFT)
Maybe BIT()?
...
> +struct mock_phc *mock_phc_create(struct device *dev)
> +{
> + struct mock_phc *phc;
> + int err;
> +
> + phc = kzalloc(sizeof(*phc), GFP_KERNEL);
> + if (!phc) {
> + err = -ENOMEM;
> + goto out;
> + }
> +
> + phc->info = (struct ptp_clock_info) {
> + .owner = THIS_MODULE,
> + .name = "Mock-up PTP clock",
> + .max_adj = MOCK_PHC_MAX_ADJ_PPB,
> + .adjfine = mock_phc_adjfine,
> + .adjtime = mock_phc_adjtime,
> + .gettime64 = mock_phc_gettime64,
> + .settime64 = mock_phc_settime64,
> + .do_aux_work = mock_phc_refresh,
> + };
> +
> + phc->cc = (struct cyclecounter) {
> + .read = mock_phc_cc_read,
> + .mask = CYCLECOUNTER_MASK(64),
> + .mult = MOCK_PHC_CC_MULT,
> + .shift = MOCK_PHC_CC_SHIFT,
> + };
> +
> + spin_lock_init(&phc->lock);
> + timecounter_init(&phc->tc, &phc->cc, 0);
> +
> + phc->clock = ptp_clock_register(&phc->info, dev);
> + if (IS_ERR_OR_NULL(phc->clock)) {
> + err = PTR_ERR_OR_ZERO(phc->clock);
> + goto out_free_phc;
> + }
> +
> + ptp_schedule_worker(phc->clock, MOCK_PHC_REFRESH_INTERVAL);
> +
> + return phc;
> +
> +out_free_phc:
> + kfree(phc);
> +out:
> + return ERR_PTR(err);
> +}
Smatch complains that ERR_PTR may be passed zero.
Looking at the IS_ERR_OR_NULL block above, this does indeed seem to be the
case.
Keeping Smatch happy is one thing - your call - but I do wonder if the
caller of mock_phc_create() handles the NULL case correctly.
...
Powered by blists - more mailing lists