netdev - Re: [net PATCH] net: ethernet: stmicro: stmmac: fix possible memory leak in __stmmac

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <ZInfrBTQDkay+UXP@corigine.com>
Date: Wed, 14 Jun 2023 17:41:32 +0200
From: Simon Horman <simon.horman@...igine.com>
To: Christian Marangi <ansuelsmth@...il.com>
Cc: Giuseppe Cavallaro <peppe.cavallaro@...com>,
	Alexandre Torgue <alexandre.torgue@...s.st.com>,
	Jose Abreu <joabreu@...opsys.com>,
	"David S. Miller" <davem@...emloft.net>,
	Eric Dumazet <edumazet@...gle.com>,
	Jakub Kicinski <kuba@...nel.org>, Paolo Abeni <pabeni@...hat.com>,
	Maxime Coquelin <mcoquelin.stm32@...il.com>,
	Russell King <linux@...linux.org.uk>, netdev@...r.kernel.org,
	linux-stm32@...md-mailman.stormreply.com,
	linux-arm-kernel@...ts.infradead.org, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
	Jose Abreu <Jose.Abreu@...opsys.com>, stable@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [net PATCH] net: ethernet: stmicro: stmmac: fix possible memory
 leak in __stmmac_open

On Wed, Jun 14, 2023 at 10:18:20AM +0200, Christian Marangi wrote:
> On Wed, Jun 14, 2023 at 04:55:10PM +0200, Simon Horman wrote:
> > On Wed, Jun 14, 2023 at 09:32:41AM +0200, Christian Marangi wrote:
> > > Fix a possible memory leak in __stmmac_open when stmmac_init_phy fails.
> > > It's also needed to free everything allocated by stmmac_setup_dma_desc
> > > and not just the dma_conf struct.
> > > 
> > > Correctly call free_dma_desc_resources on the new dma_conf passed to
> > > __stmmac_open on error.
> > > 
> > > Reported-by: Jose Abreu <Jose.Abreu@...opsys.com>
> > > Fixes: ba39b344e924 ("net: ethernet: stmicro: stmmac: generate stmmac dma conf before open")
> > > Signed-off-by: Christian Marangi <ansuelsmth@...il.com>
> > > Cc: stable@...r.kernel.org
> > > ---
> > >  drivers/net/ethernet/stmicro/stmmac/stmmac_main.c | 2 +-
> > >  1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 1 deletion(-)
> > > 
> > > diff --git a/drivers/net/ethernet/stmicro/stmmac/stmmac_main.c b/drivers/net/ethernet/stmicro/stmmac/stmmac_main.c
> > > index fa07b0d50b46..0966ab86fde2 100644
> > > --- a/drivers/net/ethernet/stmicro/stmmac/stmmac_main.c
> > > +++ b/drivers/net/ethernet/stmicro/stmmac/stmmac_main.c
> > > @@ -3877,10 +3877,10 @@ static int __stmmac_open(struct net_device *dev,
> > >  
> > >  	stmmac_hw_teardown(dev);
> > >  init_error:
> > > -	free_dma_desc_resources(priv, &priv->dma_conf);
> > >  	phylink_disconnect_phy(priv->phylink);
> > >  init_phy_error:
> > >  	pm_runtime_put(priv->device);
> > > +	free_dma_desc_resources(priv, dma_conf);
> > 
> > Hi Christian,
> > 
> > Are these resources allocated by the caller?
> > If so, perhaps it would be clearer if a symmetric approach
> > was taken and the caller handled freeing them on error.
> >
> 
> Yes, they are. Handling in the caller would require some additional
> delta to this and some duplicated code but if preferred I can implement
> it. I can provide a v2 shortly if it's ok and you prefer this
> implementation.

Thanks, I think that would be best,
unless the new delta is enormous for some reason.

-- 
pw-bot: cr