netdev - Re: [PATCH net-next] gro: move the tc

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <20230614104449.2aa6ac41@kernel.org>
Date: Wed, 14 Jun 2023 10:44:49 -0700
From: Jakub Kicinski <kuba@...nel.org>
To: Simon Horman <simon.horman@...igine.com>
Cc: davem@...emloft.net, netdev@...r.kernel.org, edumazet@...gle.com,
 pabeni@...hat.com, richardbgobert@...il.com
Subject: Re: [PATCH net-next] gro: move the tc_ext comparison to a helper

On Wed, 14 Jun 2023 14:23:21 +0200 Simon Horman wrote:
> I like your patch, and I think it is a good improvement,
> but I find the patch description slightly confusing.
> 
> In my understanding of things this patch is doing two things:
> 
> 1) Moving code into a helper
> 2) Eliminating a check on CONFIG_SKB_EXTENSIONS,
>    presumably because it is selected by NET_TC_SKB_EXT.

Ah, I thought removing the check for CONFIG_SKB_EXTENSIONS
is not worth mentioning. The double ifdefs I was talking about 
was the fact that we need an ifdef both around the variable
declarations and the comparisons themselves.

> But the patch description seems to conflate these.
> 
> In any case, code looks good.