[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <b28b0e3e-87e4-5a02-c172-2d1424405a5a@redhat.com>
Date: Thu, 15 Jun 2023 16:00:13 +0200
From: Jesper Dangaard Brouer <jbrouer@...hat.com>
To: Jakub Kicinski <kuba@...nel.org>, Liang Chen <liangchen.linux@...il.com>
Cc: brouer@...hat.com, hawk@...nel.org, ilias.apalodimas@...aro.org,
netdev@...r.kernel.org, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, davem@...emloft.net,
edumazet@...gle.com, pabeni@...hat.com
Subject: Re: [PATCH net-next] page pool: not return page to alloc cache during
pool destruction
On 15/06/2023 06.20, Jakub Kicinski wrote:
> On Thu, 15 Jun 2023 09:36:45 +0800 Liang Chen wrote:
>> When destroying a page pool, the alloc cache and recycle ring are emptied.
>> If there are inflight pages, the retry process will periodically check the
>> recycle ring for recently returned pages, but not the alloc cache (alloc
>> cache is only emptied once). As a result, any pages returned to the alloc
>> cache after the page pool destruction will be stuck there and cause the
>> retry process to continuously look for inflight pages and report warnings.
>>
>> To safeguard against this situation, any pages returning to the alloc cache
>> after pool destruction should be prevented.
>
> Let's hear from the page pool maintainers but I think the driver
> is supposed to prevent allocations while pool is getting destroyed.
Yes, this is a driver API violation. Direct returns (allow_direct) can
only happen from drivers RX path, e.g while driver is active processing
packets (in NAPI). When driver is shutting down a page_pool, it MUST
have stopped RX path and NAPI (napi_disable()) before calling
page_pool_destroy() Thus, this situation cannot happen and if it does
it is a driver bug.
> Perhaps we can add DEBUG_NET_WARN_ON_ONCE() for this condition to
> prevent wasting cycles in production builds?
>
For this page_pool code path ("allow_direct") it is extremely important
we avoid wasting cycles in production. As this is used for XDP_DROP
use-cases for 100Gbit/s NICs.
At 100Gbit/s with 64 bytes Ethernet frames (84 on wire), the wirespeed
is 148.8Mpps which gives CPU 6.72 nanosec to process each packet.
The microbench[1] shows (below signature) that page_pool_alloc_pages() +
page_pool_recycle_direct() cost 4.041 ns (or 14 cycles(tsc)).
Thus, for this code fast-path every cycle counts.
In practice PCIe transactions/sec seems limit total system to 108Mpps
(with multiple RX-queues + descriptor compression) thus 9.26 nanosec to
process each packet. Individual hardware RX queues seems be limited to
around 36Mpps thus 27.77 nanosec to process each packet.
Adding a DEBUG_NET_WARN_ON_ONCE will be annoying as I like to run my
testlab kernels with CONFIG_DEBUG_NET, which will change this extreme
fash-path slightly (adding some unlikely's affecting code layout to the
mix).
Question to Liang Chen: Did you hit this bug in practice?
--Jesper
CPU E5-1650 v4 @ 3.60GHz
tasklet_page_pool01_fast_path Per elem: 14 cycles(tsc) 4.041 ns
tasklet_page_pool02_ptr_ring Per elem: 49 cycles(tsc) 13.622 ns
tasklet_page_pool03_slow Per elem: 162 cycles(tsc) 45.198 ns
[1]
https://github.com/netoptimizer/prototype-kernel/blob/master/kernel/lib/bench_page_pool_simple.c
Powered by blists - more mailing lists