[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <ZIsrhuxRrx2AwI7F@xhacker>
Date: Thu, 15 Jun 2023 23:17:26 +0800
From: Jisheng Zhang <jszhang@...nel.org>
To: Simon Horman <simon.horman@...igine.com>
Cc: Giuseppe Cavallaro <peppe.cavallaro@...com>,
Alexandre Torgue <alexandre.torgue@...s.st.com>,
Jose Abreu <joabreu@...opsys.com>,
"David S . Miller" <davem@...emloft.net>,
Eric Dumazet <edumazet@...gle.com>,
Jakub Kicinski <kuba@...nel.org>, Paolo Abeni <pabeni@...hat.com>,
Maxime Coquelin <mcoquelin.stm32@...il.com>,
Chen-Yu Tsai <wens@...e.org>,
Jernej Skrabec <jernej.skrabec@...il.com>,
Samuel Holland <samuel@...lland.org>, netdev@...r.kernel.org,
linux-arm-kernel@...ts.infradead.org, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
linux-sunxi@...ts.linux.dev
Subject: Re: [PATCH 0/3] net: stmmac: fix & improve driver statistics
On Wed, Jun 14, 2023 at 09:39:17PM +0200, Simon Horman wrote:
> On Thu, Jun 15, 2023 at 12:18:44AM +0800, Jisheng Zhang wrote:
> > patch1 and patch2 fix two issues in net driver statistics:
> > 1. network driver statistics are cleared in .ndo_close() and
> > .ndo_open() cycle
> > 2. some network driver statistics overflow on 32 bit platforms
>
> I would encourage you to describe these as enhancements or similar,
> but not fixes. Because fix implies a bug, such as a crash. And
> bugs for fixes are handled by a slightly different process which
> often includes backporting.
So it seems I need to fold patch2 and patch3 into one patch. Previously
I thought the counters overflow on 32 bit platforms was a bug, thus
I split the 64bit stats patch into patch2 and patch3 so that patch2
can be backported to stable tree.
I will fold patch2 and patch3 into one patch in v2.
Thanks for your review.
>
> > patch3 use pcpu statistics where necessary to remove frequent
> > cacheline ping pongs.
>
> Assuming these are three enhancements, then they should be
> targeted at the net-next tree. And that should be noted in the subject:
>
> Subject: [PATCH net-next v2] ...
>
> Unfortunately the series does not seem to apply to net-next
> in its current form. So it probably needs to be rebased and reposted.
>
> If you do post an updated series, please observe a 24h grace
> period between postings, to give reviewers time to do their thing.
>
> Link: https://docs.kernel.org/process/maintainer-netdev.html
Powered by blists - more mailing lists