[<prev] [next>] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <ZIxQIBfO9dH5xFlg@shell.armlinux.org.uk>
Date: Fri, 16 Jun 2023 13:05:52 +0100
From: "Russell King (Oracle)" <linux@...linux.org.uk>
To: Andrew Lunn <andrew@...n.ch>, Heiner Kallweit <hkallweit1@...il.com>
Cc: Alexander Couzens <lynxis@...0.eu>,
AngeloGioacchino Del Regno <angelogioacchino.delregno@...labora.com>,
Cc@....codeaurora.org:Claudiu Beznea <claudiu.beznea@...rochip.com>,
Daniel Golle <daniel@...rotopia.org>,
Daniel Machon <daniel.machon@...rochip.com>,
"David S. Miller" <davem@...emloft.net>,
DENG Qingfang <dqfext@...il.com>, Eric Dumazet <edumazet@...gle.com>,
Florian Fainelli <f.fainelli@...il.com>,
Horatiu Vultur <horatiu.vultur@...rochip.com>,
Ioana Ciornei <ioana.ciornei@....com>,
Jakub Kicinski <kuba@...nel.org>,
Jose Abreu <Jose.Abreu@...opsys.com>,
Landen Chao <Landen.Chao@...iatek.com>,
Lars Povlsen <lars.povlsen@...rochip.com>,
linux-arm-kernel@...ts.infradead.org,
linux-mediatek@...ts.infradead.org,
Madalin Bucur <madalin.bucur@....com>,
Marcin Wojtas <mw@...ihalf.com>,
Matthias Brugger <matthias.bgg@...il.com>,
Michal Simek <michal.simek@....com>, netdev@...r.kernel.org,
Nicolas Ferre <nicolas.ferre@...rochip.com>,
Paolo Abeni <pabeni@...hat.com>,
Radhey Shyam Pandey <radhey.shyam.pandey@...inx.com>,
Sean Anderson <sean.anderson@...o.com>,
Sean Wang <sean.wang@...iatek.com>,
Steen Hegelund <Steen.Hegelund@...rochip.com>,
Taras Chornyi <taras.chornyi@...ision.eu>,
Thomas Petazzoni <thomas.petazzoni@...tlin.com>,
UNGLinuxDriver@...rochip.com, Vladimir Oltean <olteanv@...il.com>
Subject: [PATCH net-next 0/15] Add and use helper for PCS negotiation modes
Hi,
Earlier this month, I proposed a helper for deciding whether a PCS
should use inband negotiation modes or not. There was some discussion
around this topic, and I believe there was no disagreement about
providing the helper.
The initial discussion can be found at:
https://lore.kernel.org/r/ZGIkGmyL8yL1q1zp@shell.armlinux.org.uk
Subsequently, I posted a RFC series back in May:
https://lore.kernel.org/r/ZGzhvePzPjJ0v2En@shell.armlinux.org.uk
that added a helper, phylink_pcs_neg_mode() which PCS drivers could use
to parse the state, and updated a bunch of drivers to use it. I got
a couple of bits of feedback to it, including some ACKs.
However, I've decided to take this slightly further and change the
"mode" parameter to both the pcs_config() and pcs_link_up() methods
when a PCS driver opts in to this (by setting "neg_mode" in the
phylink_pcs structure.) If this is not set, we default to the old
behaviour. That said, this series converts all the PCS implementations
I can find currently in net-next.
Doing this has the added benefit that the negotiation mode parameter
is also available to the pcs_link_up() function, which can now know
whether inband negotiation was in fact enabled or not at pcs_config()
time.
It has been posted as RFC at:
https://lore.kernel.org/r/ZIh/CLQ3z89g0Ua0@shell.armlinux.org.uk
and received one reply, thanks Elad, which is a similar amount of
interest to previous postings. Let's post it as non-RFC and see
whether we get more reaction.
drivers/net/dsa/qca/qca8k-8xxx.c | 13 ++-
drivers/net/dsa/sja1105/sja1105_main.c | 14 ++-
drivers/net/ethernet/freescale/fman/fman_dtsec.c | 7 +-
drivers/net/ethernet/marvell/mvneta.c | 7 +-
drivers/net/ethernet/marvell/mvpp2/mvpp2_main.c | 14 +--
.../net/ethernet/marvell/prestera/prestera_main.c | 11 +--
.../net/ethernet/microchip/lan966x/lan966x_main.c | 1 +
.../ethernet/microchip/lan966x/lan966x_phylink.c | 7 +-
.../net/ethernet/microchip/sparx5/sparx5_main.c | 1 +
.../net/ethernet/microchip/sparx5/sparx5_phylink.c | 8 +-
drivers/net/ethernet/xilinx/xilinx_axienet_main.c | 6 +-
drivers/net/pcs/pcs-lynx.c | 48 +++++----
drivers/net/pcs/pcs-mtk-lynxi.c | 39 +++-----
drivers/net/pcs/pcs-xpcs.c | 43 ++++----
drivers/net/phy/phylink.c | 59 +++++++----
include/linux/pcs/pcs-xpcs.h | 4 +-
include/linux/phylink.h | 109 +++++++++++++++++++--
17 files changed, 253 insertions(+), 138 deletions(-)
--
RMK's Patch system: https://www.armlinux.org.uk/developer/patches/
FTTP is here! 80Mbps down 10Mbps up. Decent connectivity at last!
Powered by blists - more mailing lists