[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <ZIxfK1MVRL+1wDvq@corigine.com>
Date: Fri, 16 Jun 2023 15:10:03 +0200
From: Simon Horman <simon.horman@...igine.com>
To: Arnd Bergmann <arnd@...nel.org>
Cc: Igor Russkikh <irusskikh@...vell.com>,
"David S. Miller" <davem@...emloft.net>,
Eric Dumazet <edumazet@...gle.com>,
Jakub Kicinski <kuba@...nel.org>, Paolo Abeni <pabeni@...hat.com>,
Arnd Bergmann <arnd@...db.de>,
Nathan Chancellor <nathan@...nel.org>,
Nick Desaulniers <ndesaulniers@...gle.com>,
Tom Rix <trix@...hat.com>, netdev@...r.kernel.org,
linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, llvm@...ts.linux.dev
Subject: Re: [PATCH] net: atlantic: fix ring buffer alignment
On Fri, Jun 16, 2023 at 11:26:32AM +0200, Arnd Bergmann wrote:
> From: Arnd Bergmann <arnd@...db.de>
>
> clang warns about conflicting packing annotations:
>
> drivers/net/ethernet/aquantia/atlantic/aq_ring.h:72:2: error: field within 'struct aq_ring_buff_s' is less aligned than 'union aq_ring_buff_s::(anonymous at drivers/net/ethernet/aquantia/atlantic/aq_ring.h:72:2)' and is usually due to 'struct aq_ring_buff_s' being packed, which can lead to unaligned accesses [-Werror,-Wunaligned-access]
FWIIW, I was able to reproduce this (warning) with clang-16 on ARM (32bit).
And I agree with the approach you have taken here.
> This was originally intended to ensure the structure fits exactly into
> 32 bytes on 64-bit architectures, but apparently never did, and instead
> just produced misaligned pointers as well as forcing byte-wise access
> on hardware without unaligned load/store instructions.
>
> Update the comment to more closely reflect the layout and remove the
> broken __packed annotation.
>
> Signed-off-by: Arnd Bergmann <arnd@...db.de>
> ---
> .../net/ethernet/aquantia/atlantic/aq_ring.h | 26 +++++++++++--------
> 1 file changed, 15 insertions(+), 11 deletions(-)
>
> diff --git a/drivers/net/ethernet/aquantia/atlantic/aq_ring.h b/drivers/net/ethernet/aquantia/atlantic/aq_ring.h
> index 0a6c34438c1d0..a9cc5a1c4c479 100644
> --- a/drivers/net/ethernet/aquantia/atlantic/aq_ring.h
> +++ b/drivers/net/ethernet/aquantia/atlantic/aq_ring.h
> @@ -26,19 +26,23 @@ struct aq_rxpage {
> unsigned int pg_off;
> };
>
> -/* TxC SOP DX EOP
> - * +----------+----------+----------+-----------
> - * 8bytes|len l3,l4 | pa | pa | pa
> - * +----------+----------+----------+-----------
> - * 4/8bytes|len pkt |len pkt | | skb
> - * +----------+----------+----------+-----------
> - * 4/8bytes|is_gso |len,flags |len |len,is_eop
> - * +----------+----------+----------+-----------
> +/* TxC SOP DX EOP RX
> + * +----------+----------+----------+----------+-------
> + * 8bytes|len l3,l4 | pa | pa | pa | hash
> + * +----------+----------+----------+----------+-------
> + * 4/8bytes|len pkt |len pkt | | skb | page
> + * +----------+----------+----------+----------+-------
> + * 4/8bytes|is_gso |len,flags |len |len,is_eop| daddr
> + * +----------+----------+----------+----------+-------
> + * 4/8bytes| | | | | order,pgoff
> + * +----------+----------+----------+----------+-------
> + * 2bytes | | | | | vlan_rx_tag
> + * +----------+----------+----------+----------+-------
> + * 8bytes + flags
> + * +----------+----------+----------+----------+-------
Perhaps it just me. But I do have trouble reconciling the description
above with the structure below. As such, my suggest would be to simply
delete it.
> *
> - * This aq_ring_buff_s doesn't have endianness dependency.
> - * It is __packed for cache line optimizations.
> */
> -struct __packed aq_ring_buff_s {
> +struct aq_ring_buff_s {
> union {
> /* RX/TX */
> dma_addr_t pa;
Powered by blists - more mailing lists