[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <248899a6-ae04-4e57-baba-e77e79f5a4f8@lunn.ch>
Date: Fri, 16 Jun 2023 16:44:43 +0200
From: Andrew Lunn <andrew@...n.ch>
To: Michael Walle <mwalle@...nel.org>
Cc: "David S. Miller" <davem@...emloft.net>,
Eric Dumazet <edumazet@...gle.com>,
Jakub Kicinski <kuba@...nel.org>, Paolo Abeni <pabeni@...hat.com>,
Rob Herring <robh+dt@...nel.org>,
Krzysztof Kozlowski <krzysztof.kozlowski+dt@...aro.org>,
Conor Dooley <conor+dt@...nel.org>,
Michael Walle <michael@...le.cc>, netdev@...r.kernel.org,
devicetree@...r.kernel.org, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
Rob Herring <robh@...nel.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH net-next] dt-bindings: net: phy: gpy2xx: more precise
description
On Fri, Jun 16, 2023 at 12:45:57PM +0200, Michael Walle wrote:
> Mention that the interrupt line is just asserted for a random period of
> time, not the entire time.
>
> Suggested-by: Rob Herring <robh@...nel.org>
> Signed-off-by: Michael Walle <mwalle@...nel.org>
Reviewed-by: Andrew Lunn <andrew@...n.ch>
Andrew
Powered by blists - more mailing lists