netdev - Re: [PATCH net-next v4 0/2] xdp_rxq_info

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Date: Fri, 16 Jun 2023 12:23:24 -0700
From: Jakub Kicinski <kuba@...nel.org>
To: Saeed Mahameed <saeed@...nel.org>
Cc: Maxim Mikityanskiy <maxtram95@...il.com>, netdev@...r.kernel.org, Saeed
 Mahameed <saeedm@...dia.com>, "David S. Miller" <davem@...emloft.net>, Eric
 Dumazet <edumazet@...gle.com>, Paolo Abeni <pabeni@...hat.com>, Gal
 Pressman <gal@...dia.com>, Tariq Toukan <tariqt@...dia.com>,
 bpf@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH net-next v4 0/2] xdp_rxq_info_reg fixes for mlx5e

On Fri, 16 Jun 2023 11:54:21 -0700 Saeed Mahameed wrote:
> On 15 Jun 22:32, Jakub Kicinski wrote:
> >On Wed, 14 Jun 2023 12:00:04 +0300 Maxim Mikityanskiy wrote:  
> >> Marked for net-next, as I'm not sure what the consensus was, but they
> >> can be applied cleanly to net as well.  
> >
> >Sorry for lack of clarity, you should drop the fixes tags.
> >If not implementing something was a bug most of the patches we merge
> >would have a fixes tag. That devalues the Fixes tag completely.
> >You can still ask Greg/Sasha to backport it later if you want.
> 
> You don't think this should go to net ? 
> 
> The first 3 version were targeting net branch .. I don't know why Maxim
> decided to switch v4 to net-next, Maybe I missed an email ? 
> 
> IMHO, I think these are net worthy since they are fixing 
> issues with blabla, for commits claiming to add support for blabla.
> 
> I already applied those earlier to my net queue and was working on
> submission today, let me know if you are ok for me to send those two
> patches in my today's net PR.

If you already have them queued up for net, that's fine.