netdev - Re: [syzbot] [crypto?] general protection fault in shash_async

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <415439.1686877276@warthog.procyon.org.uk>
Date: Fri, 16 Jun 2023 02:01:16 +0100
From: David Howells <dhowells@...hat.com>
To: syzbot <syzbot+13a08c0bf4d212766c3c@...kaller.appspotmail.com>
Cc: dhowells@...hat.com, davem@...emloft.net,
    herbert@...dor.apana.org.au, linux-crypto@...r.kernel.org,
    linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, netdev@...r.kernel.org,
    pabeni@...hat.com, syzkaller-bugs@...glegroups.com
Subject: Re: [syzbot] [crypto?] general protection fault in shash_async_final

#syz test: git://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/netdev/net-next.git main

commit c2996e733d4f2d93bdc0fed74022da082b2e6784
Author: David Howells <dhowells@...hat.com>
Date:   Wed Jun 14 13:33:04 2023 +0100

    crypto: af_alg/hash: Fix recvmsg() after sendmsg(MSG_MORE)
    
    If an AF_ALG socket bound to a hashing algorithm is sent a zero-length
    message with MSG_MORE set and then recvmsg() is called without first
    sending another message without MSG_MORE set to end the operation, an oops
    will occur because the crypto context and result doesn't now get set up in
    advance because hash_sendmsg() now defers that as long as possible in the
    hope that it can use crypto_ahash_digest() - and then because the message
    is zero-length, it the data wrangling loop is skipped.
    
    Fix this by handling zero-length sends at the top of the hash_sendmsg()
    function.  If we're not continuing the previous sendmsg(), then just ignore
    the send (hash_recvmsg() will invent something when called); if we are
    continuing, then we finalise the request at this point if MSG_MORE is not
    set to get any error here, otherwise the send is of no effect and can be
    ignored.
    
    Whilst we're at it, remove the code to create a kvmalloc'd scatterlist if
    we get more than ALG_MAX_PAGES - this shouldn't happen.
    
    Fixes: c662b043cdca ("crypto: af_alg/hash: Support MSG_SPLICE_PAGES")
    Reported-by: syzbot+13a08c0bf4d212766c3c@...kaller.appspotmail.com
    Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/000000000000b928f705fdeb873a@google.com/
    Reported-by: syzbot+14234ccf6d0ef629ec1a@...kaller.appspotmail.com
    Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/000000000000c047db05fdeb8790@google.com/
    Reported-by: syzbot+4e2e47f32607d0f72d43@...kaller.appspotmail.com
    Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/000000000000bcca3205fdeb87fb@google.com/
    Reported-by: syzbot+472626bb5e7c59fb768f@...kaller.appspotmail.com
    Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/000000000000b55d8805fdeb8385@google.com/
    Signed-off-by: David Howells <dhowells@...hat.com>
    cc: Herbert Xu <herbert@...dor.apana.org.au>
    cc: "David S. Miller" <davem@...emloft.net>
    cc: Eric Dumazet <edumazet@...gle.com>
    cc: Jakub Kicinski <kuba@...nel.org>
    cc: Paolo Abeni <pabeni@...hat.com>
    cc: Jens Axboe <axboe@...nel.dk>
    cc: Matthew Wilcox <willy@...radead.org>
    cc: linux-crypto@...r.kernel.org
    cc: netdev@...r.kernel.org

diff --git a/crypto/algif_hash.c b/crypto/algif_hash.c
index dfb048cefb60..0ab43e149f0e 100644
--- a/crypto/algif_hash.c
+++ b/crypto/algif_hash.c
@@ -76,13 +76,30 @@ static int hash_sendmsg(struct socket *sock, struct msghdr *msg,
 
 	lock_sock(sk);
 	if (!continuing) {
-		if ((msg->msg_flags & MSG_MORE))
-			hash_free_result(sk, ctx);
+		/* Discard a previous request that wasn't marked MSG_MORE. */
+		hash_free_result(sk, ctx);
+		if (!msg_data_left(msg))
+			goto done; /* Zero-length; don't start new req */
 		need_init = true;
+	} else if (!msg_data_left(msg)) {
+		/*
+		 * No data - finalise the prev req if MSG_MORE so any error
+		 * comes out here.
+		 */
+		if (!(msg->msg_flags & MSG_MORE)) {
+			err = hash_alloc_result(sk, ctx);
+			if (err)
+				goto unlock_free;
+			ahash_request_set_crypt(&ctx->req, NULL,
+						ctx->result, 0);
+			err = crypto_wait_req(crypto_ahash_final(&ctx->req),
+					      &ctx->wait);
+			if (err)
+				goto unlock_free;
+		}
+		goto done_more;
 	}
 
-	ctx->more = false;
-
 	while (msg_data_left(msg)) {
 		ctx->sgl.sgt.sgl = ctx->sgl.sgl;
 		ctx->sgl.sgt.nents = 0;
@@ -93,15 +110,6 @@ static int hash_sendmsg(struct socket *sock, struct msghdr *msg,
 		if (npages == 0)
 			goto unlock_free;
 
-		if (npages > ARRAY_SIZE(ctx->sgl.sgl)) {
-			err = -ENOMEM;
-			ctx->sgl.sgt.sgl =
-				kvmalloc(array_size(npages,
-						    sizeof(*ctx->sgl.sgt.sgl)),
-					 GFP_KERNEL);
-			if (!ctx->sgl.sgt.sgl)
-				goto unlock_free;
-		}
 		sg_init_table(ctx->sgl.sgl, npages);
 
 		ctx->sgl.need_unpin = iov_iter_extract_will_pin(&msg->msg_iter);
@@ -150,7 +158,9 @@ static int hash_sendmsg(struct socket *sock, struct msghdr *msg,
 		af_alg_free_sg(&ctx->sgl);
 	}
 
+done_more:
 	ctx->more = msg->msg_flags & MSG_MORE;
+done:
 	err = 0;
 unlock:
 	release_sock(sk);
@@ -158,6 +168,8 @@ static int hash_sendmsg(struct socket *sock, struct msghdr *msg,
 
 unlock_free:
 	af_alg_free_sg(&ctx->sgl);
+	hash_free_result(sk, ctx);
+	ctx->more = false;
 	goto unlock;
 }