[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20230618080027.GA52412@kernel.org>
Date: Sun, 18 Jun 2023 11:00:27 +0300
From: Mike Rapoport <rppt@...nel.org>
To: Andy Lutomirski <luto@...nel.org>
Cc: Linux Kernel Mailing List <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
Andrew Morton <akpm@...ux-foundation.org>,
Catalin Marinas <catalin.marinas@....com>,
Christophe Leroy <christophe.leroy@...roup.eu>,
"David S. Miller" <davem@...emloft.net>,
Dinh Nguyen <dinguyen@...nel.org>,
Heiko Carstens <hca@...ux.ibm.com>, Helge Deller <deller@....de>,
Huacai Chen <chenhuacai@...nel.org>,
Kent Overstreet <kent.overstreet@...ux.dev>,
Luis Chamberlain <mcgrof@...nel.org>,
Mark Rutland <mark.rutland@....com>,
Michael Ellerman <mpe@...erman.id.au>,
Nadav Amit <nadav.amit@...il.com>,
"Naveen N. Rao" <naveen.n.rao@...ux.ibm.com>,
Palmer Dabbelt <palmer@...belt.com>,
Puranjay Mohan <puranjay12@...il.com>,
Rick P Edgecombe <rick.p.edgecombe@...el.com>,
"Russell King (Oracle)" <linux@...linux.org.uk>,
Song Liu <song@...nel.org>, Steven Rostedt <rostedt@...dmis.org>,
Thomas Bogendoerfer <tsbogend@...ha.franken.de>,
Thomas Gleixner <tglx@...utronix.de>, Will Deacon <will@...nel.org>,
bpf@...r.kernel.org, linux-arm-kernel@...ts.infradead.org,
linux-mips@...r.kernel.org, linux-mm@...ck.org,
linux-modules@...r.kernel.org, linux-parisc@...r.kernel.org,
linux-riscv@...ts.infradead.org, linux-s390@...r.kernel.org,
linux-trace-kernel@...r.kernel.org, linuxppc-dev@...ts.ozlabs.org,
loongarch@...ts.linux.dev, netdev@...r.kernel.org,
sparclinux@...r.kernel.org,
the arch/x86 maintainers <x86@...nel.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v2 02/12] mm: introduce execmem_text_alloc() and
jit_text_alloc()
On Sat, Jun 17, 2023 at 01:38:29PM -0700, Andy Lutomirski wrote:
> On Fri, Jun 16, 2023, at 1:50 AM, Mike Rapoport wrote:
> > From: "Mike Rapoport (IBM)" <rppt@...nel.org>
> >
> > module_alloc() is used everywhere as a mean to allocate memory for code.
> >
> > Beside being semantically wrong, this unnecessarily ties all subsystems
> > that need to allocate code, such as ftrace, kprobes and BPF to modules
> > and puts the burden of code allocation to the modules code.
> >
> > Several architectures override module_alloc() because of various
> > constraints where the executable memory can be located and this causes
> > additional obstacles for improvements of code allocation.
> >
> > Start splitting code allocation from modules by introducing
> > execmem_text_alloc(), execmem_free(), jit_text_alloc(), jit_free() APIs.
> >
> > Initially, execmem_text_alloc() and jit_text_alloc() are wrappers for
> > module_alloc() and execmem_free() and jit_free() are replacements of
> > module_memfree() to allow updating all call sites to use the new APIs.
> >
> > The intention semantics for new allocation APIs:
> >
> > * execmem_text_alloc() should be used to allocate memory that must reside
> > close to the kernel image, like loadable kernel modules and generated
> > code that is restricted by relative addressing.
> >
> > * jit_text_alloc() should be used to allocate memory for generated code
> > when there are no restrictions for the code placement. For
> > architectures that require that any code is within certain distance
> > from the kernel image, jit_text_alloc() will be essentially aliased to
> > execmem_text_alloc().
> >
>
> Is there anything in this series to help users do the appropriate
> synchronization when the actually populate the allocated memory with
> code? See here, for example:
This series only factors out the executable allocations from modules and
puts them in a central place.
Anything else would go on top after this lands.
> https://lore.kernel.org/linux-fsdevel/cb6533c6-cea0-4f04-95cf-b8240c6ab405@app.fastmail.com/T/#u
--
Sincerely yours,
Mike.
Powered by blists - more mailing lists