lists.openwall.net   lists  /  announce  owl-users  owl-dev  john-users  john-dev  passwdqc-users  yescrypt  popa3d-users  /  oss-security  kernel-hardening  musl  sabotage  tlsify  passwords  /  crypt-dev  xvendor  /  Bugtraq  Full-Disclosure  linux-kernel  linux-netdev  linux-ext4  linux-hardening  linux-cve-announce  PHC 
Open Source and information security mailing list archives
 
Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.
[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Date: Tue, 20 Jun 2023 05:37:28 +0000
From: "Keller, Jacob E" <jacob.e.keller@...el.com>
To: Michal Swiatkowski <michal.swiatkowski@...ux.intel.com>
CC: "intel-wired-lan@...ts.osuosl.org" <intel-wired-lan@...ts.osuosl.org>,
	"netdev@...r.kernel.org" <netdev@...r.kernel.org>, "Kitszel, Przemyslaw"
	<przemyslaw.kitszel@...el.com>
Subject: RE: [PATCH iwl-next v1 4/4] ice: manage VFs MSI-X using resource
 tracking



> -----Original Message-----
> From: Michal Swiatkowski <michal.swiatkowski@...ux.intel.com>
> Sent: Friday, June 16, 2023 1:37 AM
> To: Keller, Jacob E <jacob.e.keller@...el.com>
> Cc: intel-wired-lan@...ts.osuosl.org; netdev@...r.kernel.org; Kitszel, Przemyslaw
> <przemyslaw.kitszel@...el.com>
> Subject: Re: [PATCH iwl-next v1 4/4] ice: manage VFs MSI-X using resource
> tracking
> 
> On Thu, Jun 15, 2023 at 03:57:37PM +0000, Keller, Jacob E wrote:
> >
> >
> > > -----Original Message-----
> > > From: Michal Swiatkowski <michal.swiatkowski@...ux.intel.com>
> > > Sent: Thursday, June 15, 2023 5:39 AM
> > > To: intel-wired-lan@...ts.osuosl.org
> > > Cc: netdev@...r.kernel.org; Keller, Jacob E <jacob.e.keller@...el.com>;
> Kitszel,
> > > Przemyslaw <przemyslaw.kitszel@...el.com>; Michal Swiatkowski
> > > <michal.swiatkowski@...ux.intel.com>
> > > Subject: [PATCH iwl-next v1 4/4] ice: manage VFs MSI-X using resource
> tracking
> > >
> > > Track MSI-X for VFs using bitmap, by setting and clearing bitmap during
> > > allocation and freeing.
> > >
> > > Try to linearize irqs usage for VFs, by freeing them and allocating once
> > > again. Do it only for VFs that aren't currently running.
> > >
> > > Signed-off-by: Michal Swiatkowski <michal.swiatkowski@...ux.intel.com>
> > > Reviewed-by: Przemek Kitszel <przemyslaw.kitszel@...el.com>
> > > ---
> > >  drivers/net/ethernet/intel/ice/ice_sriov.c | 170 ++++++++++++++++++---
> > >  1 file changed, 151 insertions(+), 19 deletions(-)
> > >
> > > diff --git a/drivers/net/ethernet/intel/ice/ice_sriov.c
> > > b/drivers/net/ethernet/intel/ice/ice_sriov.c
> > > index e20ef1924fae..78a41163755b 100644
> > > --- a/drivers/net/ethernet/intel/ice/ice_sriov.c
> > > +++ b/drivers/net/ethernet/intel/ice/ice_sriov.c
> > > @@ -246,22 +246,6 @@ static struct ice_vsi *ice_vf_vsi_setup(struct ice_vf
> *vf)
> > >  	return vsi;
> > >  }
> > >
> > > -/**
> > > - * ice_calc_vf_first_vector_idx - Calculate MSIX vector index in the PF space
> > > - * @pf: pointer to PF structure
> > > - * @vf: pointer to VF that the first MSIX vector index is being calculated for
> > > - *
> > > - * This returns the first MSIX vector index in PF space that is used by this VF.
> > > - * This index is used when accessing PF relative registers such as
> > > - * GLINT_VECT2FUNC and GLINT_DYN_CTL.
> > > - * This will always be the OICR index in the AVF driver so any functionality
> > > - * using vf->first_vector_idx for queue configuration will have to increment
> by
> > > - * 1 to avoid meddling with the OICR index.
> > > - */
> > > -static int ice_calc_vf_first_vector_idx(struct ice_pf *pf, struct ice_vf *vf)
> > > -{
> > > -	return pf->sriov_base_vector + vf->vf_id * pf->vfs.num_msix_per;
> > > -}
> > >
> > >  /**
> > >   * ice_ena_vf_msix_mappings - enable VF MSIX mappings in hardware
> > > @@ -528,6 +512,52 @@ static int ice_set_per_vf_res(struct ice_pf *pf, u16
> > > num_vfs)
> > >  	return 0;
> > >  }
> > >
> > > +/**
> > > + * ice_sriov_get_irqs - get irqs for SR-IOV usacase
> > > + * @pf: pointer to PF structure
> > > + * @needed: number of irqs to get
> > > + *
> > > + * This returns the first MSI-X vector index in PF space that is used by this
> > > + * VF. This index is used when accessing PF relative registers such as
> > > + * GLINT_VECT2FUNC and GLINT_DYN_CTL.
> > > + * This will always be the OICR index in the AVF driver so any functionality
> > > + * using vf->first_vector_idx for queue configuration_id: id of VF which will
> > > + * use this irqs
> > > + *
> > > + * Only SRIOV specific vectors are tracked in sriov_irq_bm. SRIOV vectors are
> > > + * allocated from the end of global irq index. First bit in sriov_irq_bm means
> > > + * last irq index etc. It simplifies extension of SRIOV vectors.
> > > + * They will be always located from sriov_base_vector to the last irq
> > > + * index. While increasing/decreasing sriov_base_vector can be moved.
> > > + */
> > > +static int ice_sriov_get_irqs(struct ice_pf *pf, u16 needed)
> > > +{
> > > +	int res = bitmap_find_next_zero_area(pf->sriov_irq_bm,
> > > +					     pf->sriov_irq_size, 0, needed, 0);
> > > +	/* conversion from number in bitmap to global irq index */
> > > +	int index = pf->sriov_irq_size - res - needed;
> > > +
> > > +	if (res >= pf->sriov_irq_size || index < pf->sriov_base_vector)
> > > +		return -ENOENT;
> > > +
> > > +	bitmap_set(pf->sriov_irq_bm, res, needed);
> > > +	return index;
> >
> > Shouldn't it be possible to use the xarray that was recently done for dynamic
> IRQ allocation for this now? It might take a little more refactor work though,
> hmm. It feels weird to introduce yet another data structure for a nearly identical
> purpose...
> >
> 
> I used bitmap because it was easy to get linear irq indexes (it is need
> for VF to have linear indexes). Do you know how to assume that with
> xarray? I felt like solution with storing in xarray and searching for
> linear space was more complicated than bitmap, but probably I don't know
> useful xarray mechanism for that purpose. If you know please point me
> and I will rewrite it to use xarray.
> 
> Thanks
> 
> [...]

My goal wasn't specifically to use xarray, but rather to use the existing IRQ tracking data structure (which happens to be xarray), rather than adding another tracking structure that is separate. I don't know if that is feasible, so maybe having a separate bitmap is necessary.

Powered by blists - more mailing lists

Powered by Openwall GNU/*/Linux Powered by OpenVZ