lists.openwall.net   lists  /  announce  owl-users  owl-dev  john-users  john-dev  passwdqc-users  yescrypt  popa3d-users  /  oss-security  kernel-hardening  musl  sabotage  tlsify  passwords  /  crypt-dev  xvendor  /  Bugtraq  Full-Disclosure  linux-kernel  linux-netdev  linux-ext4  linux-hardening  linux-cve-announce  PHC 
Open Source and information security mailing list archives
 
Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.
[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Date: Tue, 20 Jun 2023 21:21:37 +0200
From: Andrew Lunn <andrew@...n.ch>
To: Mengyuan Lou <mengyuanlou@...-swift.com>
Cc: netdev@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH net-next] net: ngbe: add Wake on Lan support

> +static void ngbe_get_wol(struct net_device *netdev,
> +			 struct ethtool_wolinfo *wol)
> +{
> +	struct wx *wx = netdev_priv(netdev);
> +
> +	if (!wx->wol_enabled)
> +		return;
> +	wol->supported = WAKE_MAGIC;

What exactly does wol_enabled mean?

You should always return what is supported. Which makes me think
wol_enabled is more like,
wol_is_supported_by_this_version_of_firmware?

If it is this, please give it a better name than wol_enabled.

> +static int ngbe_resume(struct pci_dev *pdev)
> +{
> +	struct net_device *netdev;
> +	struct wx *wx;
> +	u32 err;
> +
> +	wx = pci_get_drvdata(pdev);
> +	netdev = wx->netdev;
> +
> +	err = pci_enable_device_mem(pdev);
> +	if (err) {
> +		wx_err(wx, "Cannot enable PCI device from suspend\n");
> +		return err;
> +	}
> +	/* make sure to complete pre-operations */
> +	smp_mb__before_atomic();

I've no idea what this actually does, but it seems to be used a lot in
pairs with smp_mb__after_atomic(). Is it actually valid to use it on
its own, not in a pair?

    Andrew

Powered by blists - more mailing lists

Powered by Openwall GNU/*/Linux Powered by OpenVZ