[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <1226381.1687249916@warthog.procyon.org.uk>
Date: Tue, 20 Jun 2023 09:31:56 +0100
From: David Howells <dhowells@...hat.com>
To: Herbert Xu <herbert@...dor.apana.org.au>
Cc: dhowells@...hat.com, netdev@...r.kernel.org,
syzbot+13a08c0bf4d212766c3c@...kaller.appspotmail.com,
syzbot+14234ccf6d0ef629ec1a@...kaller.appspotmail.com,
syzbot+4e2e47f32607d0f72d43@...kaller.appspotmail.com,
syzbot+472626bb5e7c59fb768f@...kaller.appspotmail.com,
"David S. Miller" <davem@...emloft.net>,
Eric Dumazet <edumazet@...gle.com>, Jakub Kicinski <kuba@...nel.org>,
Paolo Abeni <pabeni@...hat.com>, Jens Axboe <axboe@...nel.dk>,
Matthew Wilcox <willy@...radead.org>, linux-crypto@...r.kernel.org,
linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH net-next v2] crypto: af_alg/hash: Fix recvmsg() after sendmsg(MSG_MORE)
Herbert Xu <herbert@...dor.apana.org.au> wrote:
> > However, given you want sendmsg() to do the init->digest cycle on zero length
> > data, I think we should revert to the previous version of the patch that makes
> > a pass of the loop even with no data.
>
> Let's get this fixed ASAP and we can refine it later.
>
> Acked-by: Herbert Xu <herbert@...dor.apana.org.au>
Um. Is that against this patch or the old version?
David
Powered by blists - more mailing lists