netdev - Re: [net-next PATCH v4 0/3] leds: trigger: netdev: add additional modes

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <20230620102629.GD1472962@google.com>
Date: Tue, 20 Jun 2023 11:26:29 +0100
From: Lee Jones <lee@...nel.org>
To: Andrew Lunn <andrew@...n.ch>
Cc: Christian Marangi <ansuelsmth@...il.com>, Pavel Machek <pavel@....cz>,
	"David S. Miller" <davem@...emloft.net>,
	Yang Li <yang.lee@...ux.alibaba.com>, linux-leds@...r.kernel.org,
	linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, netdev@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [net-next PATCH v4 0/3] leds: trigger: netdev: add additional
 modes

On Mon, 19 Jun 2023, Andrew Lunn wrote:

> > Seeing as we're on -rc7 already, any reason why we shouldn't hold off
> > and simply apply these against LEDs once v6.5 is released?
> 
> Each subsystem has its own policies. netdev tends to accept patches
> right up until the merge window opens, sometimes even a couple of days
> into the merge window for low risk changes. Maybe this is because
> netdev is fast moving, two weeks of not merging results in a big
> backlog of patches, making it a bumpy restart once merging is started
> again. And is some of those late patches breaks something, there is
> still 7 weeks to fix it.
> 
> Since this is cross subsystems i would expect both subsystems
> Maintainers to agree to a merge or not. If you want to be more
> conservative than netdev, wait until after the next merge window,
> please say so.
> 
> If you do decided to wait, you are going to need to create another
> stable branch to pull into netdev. I know it is not a huge overhead,
> but it is still work, coordination etc.

Can you clarify you last point for me please?

-- 
Lee Jones [李琼斯]