[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <ZJFu1cPT2sOVuczK@shell.armlinux.org.uk>
Date: Tue, 20 Jun 2023 10:18:13 +0100
From: "Russell King (Oracle)" <linux@...linux.org.uk>
To: Andrew Lunn <andrew@...n.ch>, Heiner Kallweit <hkallweit1@...il.com>,
"David S. Miller" <davem@...emloft.net>,
Jakub Kicinski <kuba@...nel.org>, Paolo Abeni <pabeni@...hat.com>
Cc: Alexander Couzens <lynxis@...0.eu>,
AngeloGioacchino Del Regno <angelogioacchino.delregno@...labora.com>,
Claudiu Beznea <claudiu.beznea@...rochip.com>,
Daniel Golle <daniel@...rotopia.org>,
Daniel Machon <daniel.machon@...rochip.com>,
DENG Qingfang <dqfext@...il.com>,
Eric Dumazet <edumazet@...gle.com>,
Florian Fainelli <f.fainelli@...il.com>,
Horatiu Vultur <horatiu.vultur@...rochip.com>,
Ioana Ciornei <ioana.ciornei@....com>,
Jose Abreu <Jose.Abreu@...opsys.com>,
Landen Chao <Landen.Chao@...iatek.com>,
Lars Povlsen <lars.povlsen@...rochip.com>,
linux-arm-kernel@...ts.infradead.org,
linux-mediatek@...ts.infradead.org,
Madalin Bucur <madalin.bucur@....com>,
Marcin Wojtas <mw@...ihalf.com>,
Matthias Brugger <matthias.bgg@...il.com>,
Michal Simek <michal.simek@....com>, netdev@...r.kernel.org,
Nicolas Ferre <nicolas.ferre@...rochip.com>,
Radhey Shyam Pandey <radhey.shyam.pandey@...inx.com>,
Sean Anderson <sean.anderson@...o.com>,
Sean Wang <sean.wang@...iatek.com>,
Steen Hegelund <Steen.Hegelund@...rochip.com>,
Taras Chornyi <taras.chornyi@...ision.eu>,
Thomas Petazzoni <thomas.petazzoni@...tlin.com>,
UNGLinuxDriver@...rochip.com, Vladimir Oltean <olteanv@...il.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH net-next 11/15] net: qca8k: update PCS driver to use
neg_mode
On Fri, Jun 16, 2023 at 01:07:14PM +0100, Russell King (Oracle) wrote:
> Update qca8k's embedded PCS driver to use neg_mode rather than the
> mode argument. As there is no pcs_link_up() method, this only affects
> the pcs_config() method.
>
> Signed-off-by: Russell King (Oracle) <rmk+kernel@...linux.org.uk>
I see netdevbpf patchwork is complaining that I didn't Cc a maintainer
for this patch (ansuelsmth@...il.com). Why is it complaining? This
address is *not* in the MAINTAINERS file in the net-next tree neither
for the version I generated the patch against (tip on submission date),
today's tip, nor the net tree.
Is patchwork using an outdated MAINTAINERS file?
--
RMK's Patch system: https://www.armlinux.org.uk/developer/patches/
FTTP is here! 80Mbps down 10Mbps up. Decent connectivity at last!
Powered by blists - more mailing lists