netdev - RE: [PATCH iwl-next v6 00/10] Implement support for SRIOV + LAG

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <MW5PR11MB581140622B33E82BC694C7FDDD5DA@MW5PR11MB5811.namprd11.prod.outlook.com>
Date: Wed, 21 Jun 2023 14:39:00 +0000
From: "Ertman, David M" <david.m.ertman@...el.com>
To: Jakub Kicinski <kuba@...nel.org>
CC: "intel-wired-lan@...ts.osuosl.org" <intel-wired-lan@...ts.osuosl.org>,
	"netdev@...r.kernel.org" <netdev@...r.kernel.org>,
	"daniel.machon@...rochip.com" <daniel.machon@...rochip.com>,
	"simon.horman@...igine.com" <simon.horman@...igine.com>, "bcreeley@....com"
	<bcreeley@....com>, "Nguyen, Anthony L" <anthony.l.nguyen@...el.com>
Subject: RE: [PATCH iwl-next v6 00/10] Implement support for SRIOV + LAG

> -----Original Message-----
> From: Jakub Kicinski <kuba@...nel.org>
> Sent: Tuesday, June 20, 2023 7:19 PM
> To: Ertman, David M <david.m.ertman@...el.com>
> Cc: intel-wired-lan@...ts.osuosl.org; netdev@...r.kernel.org;
> daniel.machon@...rochip.com; simon.horman@...igine.com;
> bcreeley@....com; Nguyen, Anthony L <anthony.l.nguyen@...el.com>
> Subject: Re: [PATCH iwl-next v6 00/10] Implement support for SRIOV + LAG
> 
> On Tue, 20 Jun 2023 15:18:44 -0700 Dave Ertman wrote:
> > Implement support for SRIOV VF's on interfaces that are in an
> > aggregate interface.
> >
> > The first interface added into the aggregate will be flagged as
> > the primary interface, and this primary interface will be
> > responsible for managing the VF's resources.  VF's created on the
> > primary are the only VFs that will be supported on the aggregate.
> > Only Active-Backup mode will be supported and only aggregates whose
> > primary interface is in switchdev mode will be supported.
> 
> If you're CCing netdev you need to obey netdev rules:
> 
> https://www.kernel.org/doc/html/next/process/maintainer-
> netdev.html#resending-after-review
> 
> You have sent two version of this today (and there weren't even
> any replies).

I apologize for that!  V5 was an accidental resend from the patch-set from last week, v6 is the
revision  after responding to the feedback over the weekend.

Never try sending a patch set in the morning of coming back from a long weekend - lesson learned!

DaveE