[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <8d3340de-34f6-47ad-8024-f6f5ecd9c4bb@lunn.ch>
Date: Wed, 21 Jun 2023 20:30:21 +0200
From: Andrew Lunn <andrew@...n.ch>
To: "Limonciello, Mario" <mario.limonciello@....com>
Cc: Johannes Berg <johannes@...solutions.net>,
Evan Quan <evan.quan@....com>, rafael@...nel.org, lenb@...nel.org,
alexander.deucher@....com, christian.koenig@....com,
Xinhui.Pan@....com, airlied@...il.com, daniel@...ll.ch,
davem@...emloft.net, edumazet@...gle.com, kuba@...nel.org,
pabeni@...hat.com, mdaenzer@...hat.com,
maarten.lankhorst@...ux.intel.com, tzimmermann@...e.de,
hdegoede@...hat.com, jingyuwang_vip@....com, lijo.lazar@....com,
jim.cromie@...il.com, bellosilicio@...il.com,
andrealmeid@...lia.com, trix@...hat.com, jsg@....id.au,
arnd@...db.de, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
linux-acpi@...r.kernel.org, amd-gfx@...ts.freedesktop.org,
dri-devel@...ts.freedesktop.org, linux-wireless@...r.kernel.org,
netdev@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH V4 1/8] drivers/acpi: Add support for Wifi band RF
mitigations
> And consumer would need to call it, but only if CONFIG_WBRF_ACPI isn't set.
Why? How is ACPI special that it does not need notifiers?
> I don't see why it couldn't be a DT/ACPI hybrid solution for ARM64.
As said somewhere else, nobody does hybrid. In fact, turn it
around. Why not implement all this in DT, and make X86 hybrid? That
will make arm, powerpc, risc-v and mips much simpler :-)
Andrew
Powered by blists - more mailing lists