netdev - Re: [PATCH net-next 00/12] net: stmmac: replace boolean fields in plat_stmmacenet

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <20230621131222.071b9fc3@kernel.org>
Date: Wed, 21 Jun 2023 13:12:22 -0700
From: Jakub Kicinski <kuba@...nel.org>
To: Bartosz Golaszewski <brgl@...ev.pl>
Cc: Giuseppe Cavallaro <peppe.cavallaro@...com>, Alexandre Torgue
 <alexandre.torgue@...s.st.com>, Jose Abreu <joabreu@...opsys.com>, "David S
 . Miller" <davem@...emloft.net>, Eric Dumazet <edumazet@...gle.com>, Paolo
 Abeni <pabeni@...hat.com>, Maxime Coquelin <mcoquelin.stm32@...il.com>,
 Vinod Koul <vkoul@...nel.org>, Bhupesh Sharma <bhupesh.sharma@...aro.org>,
 Chen-Yu Tsai <wens@...e.org>, Jernej Skrabec <jernej.skrabec@...il.com>,
 Samuel Holland <samuel@...lland.org>, Thierry Reding
 <thierry.reding@...il.com>, Jonathan Hunter <jonathanh@...dia.com>, Richard
 Cochran <richardcochran@...il.com>, Matthias Brugger
 <matthias.bgg@...il.com>, AngeloGioacchino Del Regno
 <angelogioacchino.delregno@...labora.com>, netdev@...r.kernel.org,
 linux-stm32@...md-mailman.stormreply.com,
 linux-arm-kernel@...ts.infradead.org, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
 linux-sunxi@...ts.linux.dev, linux-tegra@...r.kernel.org,
 linux-mediatek@...ts.infradead.org, Bartosz Golaszewski
 <bartosz.golaszewski@...aro.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH net-next 00/12] net: stmmac: replace boolean fields in
 plat_stmmacenet_data with flags

On Wed, 21 Jun 2023 20:25:46 +0200 Bartosz Golaszewski wrote:
> As suggested by Jose Abreu: let's drop all 12 boolean fields in
> plat_stmmacenet_data and replace them with a common bitfield.

Is that what Jose meant, or:

-	bool has_integrated_pcs;
+	u32 has_integrated_pcs:1;

?