lists.openwall.net   lists  /  announce  owl-users  owl-dev  john-users  john-dev  passwdqc-users  yescrypt  popa3d-users  /  oss-security  kernel-hardening  musl  sabotage  tlsify  passwords  /  crypt-dev  xvendor  /  Bugtraq  Full-Disclosure  linux-kernel  linux-netdev  linux-ext4  linux-hardening  linux-cve-announce  PHC 
Open Source and information security mailing list archives
 
Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.
[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20230622140915.top2p467qfd7slez@localhost>
Date: Thu, 22 Jun 2023 16:09:15 +0200
From: Joel Granados <j.granados@...sung.com>
To: Jakub Kicinski <kuba@...nel.org>
CC: <mcgrof@...nel.org>, Kees Cook <keescook@...omium.org>, Iurii Zaikin
	<yzaikin@...gle.com>, "David S. Miller" <davem@...emloft.net>, Eric Dumazet
	<edumazet@...gle.com>, Paolo Abeni <pabeni@...hat.com>,
	<linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>, <linux-fsdevel@...r.kernel.org>,
	<netdev@...r.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH 05/11] sysctl: Add a size arg to __register_sysctl_table

On Wed, Jun 21, 2023 at 01:53:22PM -0700, Jakub Kicinski wrote:
> On Wed, 21 Jun 2023 11:09:54 +0200 Joel Granados wrote:
> > In order to remove the end element from the ctl_table struct arrays, we
> > explicitly define the size when registering the targets.
> > __register_sysctl_table is the first function to grow a size argument.
> > For this commit to focus only on that function, we temporarily implement
> > a size calculation in register_net_sysctl, which is an indirection call
> > for all the network register calls.
> 
> You didn't CC the cover letter to netdev so replying here.
> 
> Is the motivation just the size change? Does it conflict with changes
> queued to other trees?
I will clarify the motivation in V2. But I have sent out this
https://lore.kernel.org/all/20230622135922.xtvaiy3isvq576hw@localhost/
to give some perspective.

> 
> It'd be much better if you could figure out a way to push prep into 
> 6.5 and then convert subsystems separately.
One of my objectives for V2 is to reduce the amount of subsystems that
the patch actually touches. So this might not even be an issue.
I'll keep that separation possibility in mind; thx for the idea.

Best

-- 

Joel Granados

Download attachment "signature.asc" of type "application/pgp-signature" (660 bytes)

Powered by blists - more mailing lists

Powered by Openwall GNU/*/Linux Powered by OpenVZ