netdev - Re: [PATCH RFC net-next v4 6/8] virtio/vsock: support dgrams

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <ppx75eomyyb354knfkwbwin3il2ot7hf5cefwrt6ztpcbc3pps@q736cq5v4bdh>
Date: Thu, 22 Jun 2023 18:09:12 +0200
From: Stefano Garzarella <sgarzare@...hat.com>
To: Arseniy Krasnov <oxffffaa@...il.com>
Cc: Bobby Eshleman <bobby.eshleman@...edance.com>, 
	Stefan Hajnoczi <stefanha@...hat.com>, "Michael S. Tsirkin" <mst@...hat.com>, 
	Jason Wang <jasowang@...hat.com>, Xuan Zhuo <xuanzhuo@...ux.alibaba.com>, 
	"David S. Miller" <davem@...emloft.net>, Eric Dumazet <edumazet@...gle.com>, 
	Jakub Kicinski <kuba@...nel.org>, Paolo Abeni <pabeni@...hat.com>, 
	"K. Y. Srinivasan" <kys@...rosoft.com>, Haiyang Zhang <haiyangz@...rosoft.com>, 
	Wei Liu <wei.liu@...nel.org>, Dexuan Cui <decui@...rosoft.com>, 
	Bryan Tan <bryantan@...are.com>, Vishnu Dasa <vdasa@...are.com>, 
	VMware PV-Drivers Reviewers <pv-drivers@...are.com>, Dan Carpenter <dan.carpenter@...aro.org>, 
	Simon Horman <simon.horman@...igine.com>, kvm@...r.kernel.org, virtualization@...ts.linux-foundation.org, 
	netdev@...r.kernel.org, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, linux-hyperv@...r.kernel.org, 
	bpf@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH RFC net-next v4 6/8] virtio/vsock: support dgrams

On Sun, Jun 11, 2023 at 11:49:02PM +0300, Arseniy Krasnov wrote:
>Hello Bobby!
>
>On 10.06.2023 03:58, Bobby Eshleman wrote:
>> This commit adds support for datagrams over virtio/vsock.
>>
>> Message boundaries are preserved on a per-skb and per-vq entry basis.
>
>I'm a little bit confused about the following case: let vhost sends 4097 bytes
>datagram to the guest. Guest uses 4096 RX buffers in it's virtio queue, each
>buffer has attached empty skb to it. Vhost places first 4096 bytes to the first
>buffer of guests RX queue, and 1 last byte to the second buffer. Now IIUC guest
>has two skb in it rx queue, and user in guest wants to read data - does it read
>4097 bytes, while guest has two skb - 4096 bytes and 1 bytes? In seqpacket there is
>special marker in header which shows where message ends, and how it works here?

I think the main difference is that DGRAM is not connection-oriented, so
we don't have a stream and we can't split the packet into 2 (maybe we
could, but we have no guarantee that the second one for example will be
not discarded because there is no space).

So I think it is acceptable as a restriction to keep it simple.

My only doubt is, should we make the RX buffer size configurable,
instead of always using 4k?

Thanks,
Stefano