[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <c6f16229c7b84ff953120a12005c9397e572aa0d.camel@redhat.com>
Date: Fri, 23 Jun 2023 12:21:16 +0200
From: Paolo Abeni <pabeni@...hat.com>
To: David Howells <dhowells@...hat.com>
Cc: Jakub Kicinski <kuba@...nel.org>, Eric Dumazet <edumazet@...gle.com>,
netdev@...r.kernel.org, Alexander Duyck <alexander.duyck@...il.com>, "David
S. Miller" <davem@...emloft.net>, Willem de Bruijn
<willemdebruijn.kernel@...il.com>, David Ahern <dsahern@...nel.org>,
Matthew Wilcox <willy@...radead.org>, Jens Axboe <axboe@...nel.dk>,
linux-mm@...ck.org, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, Menglong Dong
<imagedong@...cent.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH net-next v3 01/18] net: Copy slab data for
sendmsg(MSG_SPLICE_PAGES)
On Fri, 2023-06-23 at 11:06 +0100, David Howells wrote:
> Paolo Abeni <pabeni@...hat.com> wrote:
>
> > I'm unsure I follow the above ?!? I *thought* sendpage could be killed
> > even without patch 1/18 and 2/18, leaving some patches in this series
> > unmodified, and mangling those explicitly leveraging 1/18 to use
> > multiple sendmsg()s with different flags?
>
> That's what I meant.
>
> With the example, I was showing the minimum needed replacement for a call to
> sendpage.
Thank LGTM!
Thanks,
Paolo
Powered by blists - more mailing lists