netdev - [PATCH net-next v4 04/15] ceph: Use sendmsg(MSG_SPLICE

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Date: Fri, 23 Jun 2023 12:44:14 +0100
From: David Howells <dhowells@...hat.com>
To: netdev@...r.kernel.org
Cc: David Howells <dhowells@...hat.com>,
	Alexander Duyck <alexander.duyck@...il.com>,
	"David S. Miller" <davem@...emloft.net>,
	Eric Dumazet <edumazet@...gle.com>,
	Jakub Kicinski <kuba@...nel.org>,
	Paolo Abeni <pabeni@...hat.com>,
	Willem de Bruijn <willemdebruijn.kernel@...il.com>,
	David Ahern <dsahern@...nel.org>,
	Matthew Wilcox <willy@...radead.org>,
	Jens Axboe <axboe@...nel.dk>,
	linux-mm@...ck.org,
	linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
	Ilya Dryomov <idryomov@...il.com>,
	Xiubo Li <xiubli@...hat.com>,
	Jeff Layton <jlayton@...nel.org>,
	ceph-devel@...r.kernel.org
Subject: [PATCH net-next v4 04/15] ceph: Use sendmsg(MSG_SPLICE_PAGES) rather than sendpage()

Use sendmsg() and MSG_SPLICE_PAGES rather than sendpage in ceph when
transmitting data.  For the moment, this can only transmit one page at a
time because of the architecture of net/ceph/, but if
write_partial_message_data() can be given a bvec[] at a time by the
iteration code, this would allow pages to be sent in a batch.

Signed-off-by: David Howells <dhowells@...hat.com>
cc: Ilya Dryomov <idryomov@...il.com>
cc: Xiubo Li <xiubli@...hat.com>
cc: Jeff Layton <jlayton@...nel.org>
cc: "David S. Miller" <davem@...emloft.net>
cc: Eric Dumazet <edumazet@...gle.com>
cc: Jakub Kicinski <kuba@...nel.org>
cc: Paolo Abeni <pabeni@...hat.com>
cc: Jens Axboe <axboe@...nel.dk>
cc: Matthew Wilcox <willy@...radead.org>
cc: ceph-devel@...r.kernel.org
cc: netdev@...r.kernel.org
---
 net/ceph/messenger_v2.c | 91 +++++++++--------------------------------
 1 file changed, 19 insertions(+), 72 deletions(-)

diff --git a/net/ceph/messenger_v2.c b/net/ceph/messenger_v2.c
index 301a991dc6a6..87ac97073e75 100644
--- a/net/ceph/messenger_v2.c
+++ b/net/ceph/messenger_v2.c
@@ -117,91 +117,38 @@ static int ceph_tcp_recv(struct ceph_connection *con)
 	return ret;
 }
 
-static int do_sendmsg(struct socket *sock, struct iov_iter *it)
-{
-	struct msghdr msg = { .msg_flags = CEPH_MSG_FLAGS };
-	int ret;
-
-	msg.msg_iter = *it;
-	while (iov_iter_count(it)) {
-		ret = sock_sendmsg(sock, &msg);
-		if (ret <= 0) {
-			if (ret == -EAGAIN)
-				ret = 0;
-			return ret;
-		}
-
-		iov_iter_advance(it, ret);
-	}
-
-	WARN_ON(msg_data_left(&msg));
-	return 1;
-}
-
-static int do_try_sendpage(struct socket *sock, struct iov_iter *it)
-{
-	struct msghdr msg = { .msg_flags = CEPH_MSG_FLAGS };
-	struct bio_vec bv;
-	int ret;
-
-	if (WARN_ON(!iov_iter_is_bvec(it)))
-		return -EINVAL;
-
-	while (iov_iter_count(it)) {
-		/* iov_iter_iovec() for ITER_BVEC */
-		bvec_set_page(&bv, it->bvec->bv_page,
-			      min(iov_iter_count(it),
-				  it->bvec->bv_len - it->iov_offset),
-			      it->bvec->bv_offset + it->iov_offset);
-
-		/*
-		 * sendpage cannot properly handle pages with
-		 * page_count == 0, we need to fall back to sendmsg if
-		 * that's the case.
-		 *
-		 * Same goes for slab pages: skb_can_coalesce() allows
-		 * coalescing neighboring slab objects into a single frag
-		 * which triggers one of hardened usercopy checks.
-		 */
-		if (sendpage_ok(bv.bv_page)) {
-			ret = sock->ops->sendpage(sock, bv.bv_page,
-						  bv.bv_offset, bv.bv_len,
-						  CEPH_MSG_FLAGS);
-		} else {
-			iov_iter_bvec(&msg.msg_iter, ITER_SOURCE, &bv, 1, bv.bv_len);
-			ret = sock_sendmsg(sock, &msg);
-		}
-		if (ret <= 0) {
-			if (ret == -EAGAIN)
-				ret = 0;
-			return ret;
-		}
-
-		iov_iter_advance(it, ret);
-	}
-
-	return 1;
-}
-
 /*
  * Write as much as possible.  The socket is expected to be corked,
- * so we don't bother with MSG_MORE/MSG_SENDPAGE_NOTLAST here.
+ * so we don't bother with MSG_MORE here.
  *
  * Return:
- *   1 - done, nothing (else) to write
+ *  >0 - done, nothing (else) to write
  *   0 - socket is full, need to wait
  *  <0 - error
  */
 static int ceph_tcp_send(struct ceph_connection *con)
 {
+	struct msghdr msg = {
+		.msg_iter	= con->v2.out_iter,
+		.msg_flags	= CEPH_MSG_FLAGS,
+	};
 	int ret;
 
+	if (WARN_ON(!iov_iter_is_bvec(&con->v2.out_iter)))
+		return -EINVAL;
+
+	if (con->v2.out_iter_sendpage)
+		msg.msg_flags |= MSG_SPLICE_PAGES;
+
 	dout("%s con %p have %zu try_sendpage %d\n", __func__, con,
 	     iov_iter_count(&con->v2.out_iter), con->v2.out_iter_sendpage);
-	if (con->v2.out_iter_sendpage)
-		ret = do_try_sendpage(con->sock, &con->v2.out_iter);
-	else
-		ret = do_sendmsg(con->sock, &con->v2.out_iter);
+
+	ret = sock_sendmsg(con->sock, &msg);
+	if (ret > 0)
+		iov_iter_advance(&con->v2.out_iter, ret);
+	else if (ret == -EAGAIN)
+		ret = 0;
+
 	dout("%s con %p ret %d left %zu\n", __func__, con, ret,
 	     iov_iter_count(&con->v2.out_iter));
 	return ret;