[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <71f51047892001e6cdac1de4a6f7c2b9f97c7c8b.camel@redhat.com>
Date: Fri, 23 Jun 2023 15:01:09 +0200
From: Paolo Abeni <pabeni@...hat.com>
To: Hariprasad Kelam <hkelam@...vell.com>, netdev@...r.kernel.org,
linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Cc: kuba@...nel.org, davem@...emloft.net, willemdebruijn.kernel@...il.com,
andrew@...n.ch, sgoutham@...vell.com, lcherian@...vell.com,
gakula@...vell.com, jerinj@...vell.com, sbhatta@...vell.com,
naveenm@...vell.com, edumazet@...gle.com, jhs@...atatu.com,
xiyou.wangcong@...il.com, jiri@...nulli.us, maxtram95@...il.com,
corbet@....net, linux-doc@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [net-next Patch 1/3] octeontx2-pf: implement transmit schedular
allocation algorithm
On Thu, 2023-06-22 at 14:26 +0530, Hariprasad Kelam wrote:
> diff --git a/drivers/net/ethernet/marvell/octeontx2/nic/qos.h b/drivers/net/ethernet/marvell/octeontx2/nic/qos.h
> index 19773284be27..0c5d2f79dc15 100644
> --- a/drivers/net/ethernet/marvell/octeontx2/nic/qos.h
> +++ b/drivers/net/ethernet/marvell/octeontx2/nic/qos.h
> @@ -35,6 +35,7 @@ struct otx2_qos_cfg {
> int dwrr_node_pos[NIX_TXSCH_LVL_CNT];
> u16 schq_contig_list[NIX_TXSCH_LVL_CNT][MAX_TXSCHQ_PER_FUNC];
> u16 schq_list[NIX_TXSCH_LVL_CNT][MAX_TXSCHQ_PER_FUNC];
> + u16 schq_used_index[NIX_TXSCH_LVL_CNT][MAX_TXSCHQ_PER_FUNC];
This struct is already quite big, and you use schq_used_index[x][y] as
a bool. I think you will be better off changing the used type
accordingly.
Side note 'schq_index_used' sounds a little more clear to me, but could
be simply ENONATIVELANG here ;)
Cheers,
Paolo
Powered by blists - more mailing lists