netdev - Re: net: macb: sparse warning fixes

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <fe335672-6b8d-4fb0-81ce-34f029891d39@lunn.ch>
Date: Fri, 23 Jun 2023 17:38:34 +0200
From: Andrew Lunn <andrew@...n.ch>
To: Nicolas Ferre <nicolas.ferre@...rochip.com>
Cc: Ben Dooks <ben.dooks@...ethink.co.uk>, netdev@...r.kernel.org,
	pabeni@...hat.com, kuba@...nel.org, edumazet@...gle.com,
	davem@...emloft.net, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
	claudiu.beznea@...rochip.com
Subject: Re: net: macb: sparse warning fixes

On Fri, Jun 23, 2023 at 03:16:23PM +0200, Nicolas Ferre wrote:
> Hi Ben,
> 
> On 22/06/2023 at 15:05, Ben Dooks wrote:
> > These are 3 hopefully easy patches for fixing sparse errors due to
> > endian-ness warnings. There are still some left, but there are not
> > as easy as they mix host and network fields together.
> > 
> > For example, gem_prog_cmp_regs() has two u32 variables that it does
> > bitfield manipulation on for the tcp ports and these are __be16 into
> > u32, so not sure how these are meant to be changed. I've also no hardware
> > to test on, so even if these did get changed then I can't check if it is
> > working pre/post change.
> 
> Do you know if there could be any impact on performance (even if limited)?

Hi Nicolas

This is inside a netdev_dbg(). So 99% of the time it is compiled
out. The other 1% of the time, your 115200 baud serial port is
probably the bottleneck, not an endianness swap.

	 Andrew