lists.openwall.net   lists  /  announce  owl-users  owl-dev  john-users  john-dev  passwdqc-users  yescrypt  popa3d-users  /  oss-security  kernel-hardening  musl  sabotage  tlsify  passwords  /  crypt-dev  xvendor  /  Bugtraq  Full-Disclosure  linux-kernel  linux-netdev  linux-ext4  linux-hardening  linux-cve-announce  PHC 
Open Source and information security mailing list archives
 
Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.
[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <52021da4-c2a5-5350-0a7c-273d76a221c6@linux.intel.com>
Date: Fri, 23 Jun 2023 13:54:21 +0800
From: Choong Yong Liang <yong.liang.choong@...ux.intel.com>
To: Simon Horman <simon.horman@...igine.com>
Cc: Rajneesh Bhardwaj <irenic.rajneesh@...il.com>,
 David E Box <david.e.box@...el.com>, Hans de Goede <hdegoede@...hat.com>,
 Mark Gross <markgross@...nel.org>, Jose Abreu <Jose.Abreu@...opsys.com>,
 Andrew Lunn <andrew@...n.ch>, Heiner Kallweit <hkallweit1@...il.com>,
 Russell King <linux@...linux.org.uk>, "David S . Miller"
 <davem@...emloft.net>, Eric Dumazet <edumazet@...gle.com>,
 Jakub Kicinski <kuba@...nel.org>, Paolo Abeni <pabeni@...hat.com>,
 Marek BehĂșn <kabel@...nel.org>,
 Jean Delvare <jdelvare@...e.com>, Guenter Roeck <linux@...ck-us.net>,
 Giuseppe Cavallaro <peppe.cavallaro@...com>,
 Alexandre Torgue <alexandre.torgue@...s.st.com>,
 Jose Abreu <joabreu@...opsys.com>,
 Maxime Coquelin <mcoquelin.stm32@...il.com>,
 Richard Cochran <richardcochran@...il.com>,
 Philipp Zabel <p.zabel@...gutronix.de>, Alexei Starovoitov <ast@...nel.org>,
 Daniel Borkmann <daniel@...earbox.net>,
 Jesper Dangaard Brouer <hawk@...nel.org>,
 John Fastabend <john.fastabend@...il.com>, Wong Vee Khee
 <veekhee@...le.com>, Jon Hunter <jonathanh@...dia.com>,
 Jesse Brandeburg <jesse.brandeburg@...el.com>,
 Revanth Kumar Uppala <ruppala@...dia.com>,
 Shenwei Wang <shenwei.wang@....com>,
 Andrey Konovalov <andrey.konovalov@...aro.org>,
 Jochen Henneberg <jh@...neberg-systemdesign.com>, netdev@...r.kernel.org,
 linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, linux-stm32@...md-mailman.stormreply.com,
 linux-arm-kernel@...ts.infradead.org, platform-driver-x86@...r.kernel.org,
 linux-hwmon@...r.kernel.org, bpf@...r.kernel.org,
 Voon Wei Feng <weifeng.voon@...el.com>, Tan@....codeaurora.org,
 Tee Min <tee.min.tan@...ux.intel.com>,
 Michael Sit Wei Hong <michael.wei.hong.sit@...el.com>,
 Lai Peter Jun Ann <jun.ann.lai@...el.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH net-next 1/6] platform/x86: intel_pmc_core: Add IPC
 mailbox accessor function and add SoC register access

Hi Simon,

Yes, you are right. I will add static in v2. Thank you.

On 22/6/2023 10:41 pm, Simon Horman wrote:
> On Thu, Jun 22, 2023 at 12:19:00PM +0800, Choong Yong Liang wrote:
>> From: "David E. Box" <david.e.box@...ux.intel.com>
>>
>> - Exports intel_pmc_core_ipc() for host access to the PMC IPC mailbox
>> - Add support to use IPC command allows host to access SoC registers
>> through PMC firmware that are otherwise inaccessible to the host due to
>> security policies.
>>
>> Signed-off-by: David E. Box <david.e.box@...ux.intel.com>
>> Signed-off-by: Chao Qin <chao.qin@...el.com>
>> Signed-off-by: Choong Yong Liang <yong.liang.choong@...ux.intel.com>
> 
> ...
> 
>> diff --git a/drivers/platform/x86/intel/pmc/core.c b/drivers/platform/x86/intel/pmc/core.c
>> index da6e7206d38b..0d60763c5144 100644
>> --- a/drivers/platform/x86/intel/pmc/core.c
>> +++ b/drivers/platform/x86/intel/pmc/core.c
>> @@ -16,6 +16,7 @@
>>   #include <linux/delay.h>
>>   #include <linux/dmi.h>
>>   #include <linux/io.h>
>> +#include <linux/intel_pmc_core.h>
>>   #include <linux/module.h>
>>   #include <linux/pci.h>
>>   #include <linux/slab.h>
>> @@ -26,7 +27,9 @@
>>   #include <asm/msr.h>
>>   #include <asm/tsc.h>
>>   
>> -#include "core.h"
>> +#define PMC_IPCS_PARAM_COUNT           7
>> +
>> +static const struct x86_cpu_id *pmc_cpu_id;
>>   
>>   /* Maximum number of modes supported by platfoms that has low power mode capability */
>>   const char *pmc_lpm_modes[] = {
> 
> Hi Choong Yong Liang,
> 
> It looks like pmc_lpm_mode is used in this file and, as of this patch,
> has no declaration. Should it be static?
> 
> ...
> 
>> diff --git a/drivers/platform/x86/intel/pmc/core.h b/include/linux/intel_pmc_core.h
>> similarity index 95%
>> rename from drivers/platform/x86/intel/pmc/core.h
>> rename to include/linux/intel_pmc_core.h
>> index 9ca9b9746719..82810e8b92a2 100644
>> --- a/drivers/platform/x86/intel/pmc/core.h
>> +++ b/include/linux/intel_pmc_core.h
>> @@ -250,7 +250,16 @@ enum ppfear_regs {
>>   #define MTL_LPM_STATUS_OFFSET			0x1700
>>   #define MTL_LPM_LIVE_STATUS_OFFSET		0x175C
>>   
>> -extern const char *pmc_lpm_modes[];
>> +#define IPC_SOC_REGISTER_ACCESS			0xAA
>> +#define IPC_SOC_SUB_CMD_READ			0x00
>> +#define IPC_SOC_SUB_CMD_WRITE			0x01
>> +
>> +struct pmc_ipc_cmd {
>> +	u32 cmd;
>> +	u32 sub_cmd;
>> +	u32 size;
>> +	u32 wbuf[4];
>> +};
>>   
>>   struct pmc_bit_map {
>>   	const char *name;
> 
> ...

Powered by blists - more mailing lists

Powered by Openwall GNU/*/Linux Powered by OpenVZ