[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <ZJVOMPQ1RHx5mapG@nanopsycho>
Date: Fri, 23 Jun 2023 09:48:00 +0200
From: Jiri Pirko <jiri@...nulli.us>
To: "Kubalewski, Arkadiusz" <arkadiusz.kubalewski@...el.com>
Cc: poros <poros@...hat.com>, "kuba@...nel.org" <kuba@...nel.org>,
"vadfed@...a.com" <vadfed@...a.com>,
"jonathan.lemon@...il.com" <jonathan.lemon@...il.com>,
"pabeni@...hat.com" <pabeni@...hat.com>,
"corbet@....net" <corbet@....net>,
"davem@...emloft.net" <davem@...emloft.net>,
"edumazet@...gle.com" <edumazet@...gle.com>,
"vadfed@...com" <vadfed@...com>,
"Brandeburg, Jesse" <jesse.brandeburg@...el.com>,
"Nguyen, Anthony L" <anthony.l.nguyen@...el.com>,
"M, Saeed" <saeedm@...dia.com>, "leon@...nel.org" <leon@...nel.org>,
"richardcochran@...il.com" <richardcochran@...il.com>,
"sj@...nel.org" <sj@...nel.org>,
"javierm@...hat.com" <javierm@...hat.com>,
"ricardo.canuelo@...labora.com" <ricardo.canuelo@...labora.com>,
"mst@...hat.com" <mst@...hat.com>,
"tzimmermann@...e.de" <tzimmermann@...e.de>,
"Michalik, Michal" <michal.michalik@...el.com>,
"gregkh@...uxfoundation.org" <gregkh@...uxfoundation.org>,
"jacek.lawrynowicz@...ux.intel.com" <jacek.lawrynowicz@...ux.intel.com>,
"airlied@...hat.com" <airlied@...hat.com>,
"ogabbay@...nel.org" <ogabbay@...nel.org>,
"arnd@...db.de" <arnd@...db.de>,
"nipun.gupta@....com" <nipun.gupta@....com>,
"axboe@...nel.dk" <axboe@...nel.dk>,
"linux@...y.sk" <linux@...y.sk>,
"masahiroy@...nel.org" <masahiroy@...nel.org>,
"benjamin.tissoires@...hat.com" <benjamin.tissoires@...hat.com>,
"geert+renesas@...der.be" <geert+renesas@...der.be>,
"Olech, Milena" <milena.olech@...el.com>,
"kuniyu@...zon.com" <kuniyu@...zon.com>,
"liuhangbin@...il.com" <liuhangbin@...il.com>,
"hkallweit1@...il.com" <hkallweit1@...il.com>,
"andy.ren@...cruise.com" <andy.ren@...cruise.com>,
"razor@...ckwall.org" <razor@...ckwall.org>,
"idosch@...dia.com" <idosch@...dia.com>,
"lucien.xin@...il.com" <lucien.xin@...il.com>,
"nicolas.dichtel@...nd.com" <nicolas.dichtel@...nd.com>,
"phil@....cc" <phil@....cc>,
"claudiajkang@...il.com" <claudiajkang@...il.com>,
"linux-doc@...r.kernel.org" <linux-doc@...r.kernel.org>,
"linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org" <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
"netdev@...r.kernel.org" <netdev@...r.kernel.org>,
"intel-wired-lan@...ts.osuosl.org" <intel-wired-lan@...ts.osuosl.org>,
"linux-rdma@...r.kernel.org" <linux-rdma@...r.kernel.org>,
"linux-arm-kernel@...ts.infradead.org" <linux-arm-kernel@...ts.infradead.org>,
mschmidt <mschmidt@...hat.com>,
"linux-clk@...r.kernel.org" <linux-clk@...r.kernel.org>,
"vadim.fedorenko@...ux.dev" <vadim.fedorenko@...ux.dev>
Subject: Re: [RFC PATCH v8 04/10] dpll: netlink: Add DPLL framework base
functions
Fri, Jun 23, 2023 at 02:56:24AM CEST, arkadiusz.kubalewski@...el.com wrote:
>>From: Jiri Pirko <jiri@...nulli.us>
>>Sent: Wednesday, June 21, 2023 3:08 PM
>>
>>Wed, Jun 21, 2023 at 01:53:24PM CEST, jiri@...nulli.us wrote:
>>>Wed, Jun 21, 2023 at 01:18:59PM CEST, poros@...hat.com wrote:
>>>>Arkadiusz Kubalewski píše v Pá 09. 06. 2023 v 14:18 +0200:
>>>>> From: Vadim Fedorenko <vadim.fedorenko@...ux.dev>
>>>
>>>[...]
>>>
>>>Could you perhaps cut out the text you don't comment? Saves some time
>>>finding your reply.
>>>
>>>
>>>>> +static int
>>>>> +dpll_set_from_nlattr(struct dpll_device *dpll, struct genl_info
>>>>> *info)
>>>>> +{
>>>>> + const struct dpll_device_ops *ops = dpll_device_ops(dpll);
>>>>> + struct nlattr *tb[DPLL_A_MAX + 1];
>>>>> + int ret = 0;
>>>>> +
>>>>> + nla_parse(tb, DPLL_A_MAX, genlmsg_data(info->genlhdr),
>>>>> + genlmsg_len(info->genlhdr), NULL, info->extack);
>>>>> + if (tb[DPLL_A_MODE]) {
>>>>Hi,
>>>>
>>>>Here should be something like:
>>>> if (!ops->mode_set)
>>>> return -EOPNOTSUPP;
>>>
>>>Why? All drivers implement that.
>>>I believe that it's actullaly better that way. For a called setting up
>>>the same mode it is the dpll in, there should be 0 return by the driver.
>>>Note that driver holds this value. I'd like to keep this code as it is.
>>
>>Actually, you are correct Petr, my mistake. Actually, no driver
>>implements this. Arkadiusz, could you please remove this op and
>>possibly any other unused op? It will be added when needed.
>>
>>Thanks!
>>
>
>Sorry, didn't have time for such change, added only check as suggested by
>Petr.
>If you think this is a big issue, we could change it for next version.
It's odd to carry on ops which are unused. I would prefer that to be
removed now and only introduced when they are actually needed.
>
>Thank you!
>Arkadiusz
>
>>
>>>
>>>[...]
Powered by blists - more mailing lists