Message-ID: <ZJTYWaAnMpcjeG3L@bullseye>
Date: Thu, 22 Jun 2023 23:25:13 +0000
From: Bobby Eshleman <bobbyeshleman@...il.com>
To: Arseniy Krasnov <oxffffaa@...il.com>
Cc: Bobby Eshleman <bobby.eshleman@...edance.com>,
	Stefan Hajnoczi <stefanha@...hat.com>,
	Stefano Garzarella <sgarzare@...hat.com>,
	"Michael S. Tsirkin" <mst@...hat.com>,
	Jason Wang <jasowang@...hat.com>,
	Xuan Zhuo <xuanzhuo@...ux.alibaba.com>,
	"David S. Miller" <davem@...emloft.net>,
	Eric Dumazet <edumazet@...gle.com>,
	Jakub Kicinski <kuba@...nel.org>, Paolo Abeni <pabeni@...hat.com>,
	"K. Y. Srinivasan" <kys@...rosoft.com>,
	Haiyang Zhang <haiyangz@...rosoft.com>,
	Wei Liu <wei.liu@...nel.org>, Dexuan Cui <decui@...rosoft.com>,
	Bryan Tan <bryantan@...are.com>, Vishnu Dasa <vdasa@...are.com>,
	VMware PV-Drivers Reviewers <pv-drivers@...are.com>,
	Dan Carpenter <dan.carpenter@...aro.org>,
	Simon Horman <simon.horman@...igine.com>, kvm@...r.kernel.org,
	virtualization@...ts.linux-foundation.org, netdev@...r.kernel.org,
	linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, linux-hyperv@...r.kernel.org,
	bpf@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH RFC net-next v4 1/8] vsock/dgram: generalize recvmsg and
 drop transport->dgram_dequeue

On Sun, Jun 11, 2023 at 11:43:15PM +0300, Arseniy Krasnov wrote:
> Hello Bobby! Thanks for this patchset! Small comment below:
> 
> On 10.06.2023 03:58, Bobby Eshleman wrote:
> > This commit drops the transport->dgram_dequeue callback and makes
> > vsock_dgram_recvmsg() generic. It also adds additional transport
> > callbacks for use by the generic vsock_dgram_recvmsg(), such as for
> > parsing skbs for CID/port which vary in format per transport.
> > 
> > Signed-off-by: Bobby Eshleman <bobby.eshleman@...edance.com>
> > ---
> >  drivers/vhost/vsock.c                   |  4 +-
> >  include/linux/virtio_vsock.h            |  3 ++
> >  include/net/af_vsock.h                  | 13 ++++++-
> >  net/vmw_vsock/af_vsock.c                | 51 ++++++++++++++++++++++++-
> >  net/vmw_vsock/hyperv_transport.c        | 17 +++++++--
> >  net/vmw_vsock/virtio_transport.c        |  4 +-
> >  net/vmw_vsock/virtio_transport_common.c | 18 +++++++++
> >  net/vmw_vsock/vmci_transport.c          | 68 +++++++++++++--------------------
> >  net/vmw_vsock/vsock_loopback.c          |  4 +-
> >  9 files changed, 132 insertions(+), 50 deletions(-)
> > 
> > diff --git a/drivers/vhost/vsock.c b/drivers/vhost/vsock.c
> > index 6578db78f0ae..c8201c070b4b 100644
> > --- a/drivers/vhost/vsock.c
> > +++ b/drivers/vhost/vsock.c
> > @@ -410,9 +410,11 @@ static struct virtio_transport vhost_transport = {
> >  		.cancel_pkt               = vhost_transport_cancel_pkt,
> >  
> >  		.dgram_enqueue            = virtio_transport_dgram_enqueue,
> > -		.dgram_dequeue            = virtio_transport_dgram_dequeue,
> >  		.dgram_bind               = virtio_transport_dgram_bind,
> >  		.dgram_allow              = virtio_transport_dgram_allow,
> > +		.dgram_get_cid		  = virtio_transport_dgram_get_cid,
> > +		.dgram_get_port		  = virtio_transport_dgram_get_port,
> > +		.dgram_get_length	  = virtio_transport_dgram_get_length,
> >  
> >  		.stream_enqueue           = virtio_transport_stream_enqueue,
> >  		.stream_dequeue           = virtio_transport_stream_dequeue,
> > diff --git a/include/linux/virtio_vsock.h b/include/linux/virtio_vsock.h
> > index c58453699ee9..23521a318cf0 100644
> > --- a/include/linux/virtio_vsock.h
> > +++ b/include/linux/virtio_vsock.h
> > @@ -219,6 +219,9 @@ bool virtio_transport_stream_allow(u32 cid, u32 port);
> >  int virtio_transport_dgram_bind(struct vsock_sock *vsk,
> >  				struct sockaddr_vm *addr);
> >  bool virtio_transport_dgram_allow(u32 cid, u32 port);
> > +int virtio_transport_dgram_get_cid(struct sk_buff *skb, unsigned int *cid);
> > +int virtio_transport_dgram_get_port(struct sk_buff *skb, unsigned int *port);
> > +int virtio_transport_dgram_get_length(struct sk_buff *skb, size_t *len);
> >  
> >  int virtio_transport_connect(struct vsock_sock *vsk);
> >  
> > diff --git a/include/net/af_vsock.h b/include/net/af_vsock.h
> > index 0e7504a42925..7bedb9ee7e3e 100644
> > --- a/include/net/af_vsock.h
> > +++ b/include/net/af_vsock.h
> > @@ -120,11 +120,20 @@ struct vsock_transport {
> >  
> >  	/* DGRAM. */
> >  	int (*dgram_bind)(struct vsock_sock *, struct sockaddr_vm *);
> > -	int (*dgram_dequeue)(struct vsock_sock *vsk, struct msghdr *msg,
> > -			     size_t len, int flags);
> >  	int (*dgram_enqueue)(struct vsock_sock *, struct sockaddr_vm *,
> >  			     struct msghdr *, size_t len);
> >  	bool (*dgram_allow)(u32 cid, u32 port);
> > +	int (*dgram_get_cid)(struct sk_buff *skb, unsigned int *cid);
> > +	int (*dgram_get_port)(struct sk_buff *skb, unsigned int *port);
> > +	int (*dgram_get_length)(struct sk_buff *skb, size_t *length);
> > +
> > +	/* The number of bytes into the buffer at which the payload starts, as
> > +	 * first seen by the receiving socket layer. For example, if the
> > +	 * transport presets the skb pointers using skb_pull(sizeof(header))
> > +	 * than this would be zero, otherwise it would be the size of the
> > +	 * header.
> > +	 */
> > +	const size_t dgram_payload_offset;
> >  
> >  	/* STREAM. */
> >  	/* TODO: stream_bind() */
> > diff --git a/net/vmw_vsock/af_vsock.c b/net/vmw_vsock/af_vsock.c
> > index efb8a0937a13..ffb4dd8b6ea7 100644
> > --- a/net/vmw_vsock/af_vsock.c
> > +++ b/net/vmw_vsock/af_vsock.c
> > @@ -1271,11 +1271,15 @@ static int vsock_dgram_connect(struct socket *sock,
> >  int vsock_dgram_recvmsg(struct socket *sock, struct msghdr *msg,
> >  			size_t len, int flags)
> >  {
> > +	const struct vsock_transport *transport;
> >  #ifdef CONFIG_BPF_SYSCALL
> >  	const struct proto *prot;
> >  #endif
> >  	struct vsock_sock *vsk;
> > +	struct sk_buff *skb;
> > +	size_t payload_len;
> >  	struct sock *sk;
> > +	int err;
> >  
> >  	sk = sock->sk;
> >  	vsk = vsock_sk(sk);
> > @@ -1286,7 +1290,52 @@ int vsock_dgram_recvmsg(struct socket *sock, struct msghdr *msg,
> >  		return prot->recvmsg(sk, msg, len, flags, NULL);
> >  #endif
> >  
> > -	return vsk->transport->dgram_dequeue(vsk, msg, len, flags);
> > +	if (flags & MSG_OOB || flags & MSG_ERRQUEUE)
> > +		return -EOPNOTSUPP;
> > +
> > +	transport = vsk->transport;
> > +
> > +	/* Retrieve the head sk_buff from the socket's receive queue. */
> > +	err = 0;
> > +	skb = skb_recv_datagram(sk_vsock(vsk), flags, &err);
> > +	if (!skb)
> > +		return err;
> > +
> > +	err = transport->dgram_get_length(skb, &payload_len);
> > +	if (err)
> > +		goto out;
> > +
> > +	if (payload_len > len) {
> > +		payload_len = len;
> > +		msg->msg_flags |= MSG_TRUNC;
> > +	}
> > +
> > +	/* Place the datagram payload in the user's iovec. */
> > +	err = skb_copy_datagram_msg(skb, transport->dgram_payload_offset, msg, payload_len);
> > +	if (err)
> > +		goto out;
> > +
> > +	if (msg->msg_name) {
> > +		/* Provide the address of the sender. */
> > +		DECLARE_SOCKADDR(struct sockaddr_vm *, vm_addr, msg->msg_name);
> > +		unsigned int cid, port;
> > +
> > +		err = transport->dgram_get_cid(skb, &cid);
> > +		if (err)
> > +			goto out;
> > +
> > +		err = transport->dgram_get_port(skb, &port);
> > +		if (err)
> > +			goto out;
> 
> Maybe we can merge 'dgram_get_cid' and 'dgram_get_port' to a single callback? Because I see that this is
> the only place where both are used (correct me if i'm wrong) and logically both operates with addresses:
> CID and port. E.g. something like that: dgram_get_cid_n_port().

I like this idea.

> 
> Moreover, I'm not sure, but is it good "tradeoff" here: remove transport specific callback for dgram receive
> where we already have 'msghdr' with both data buffer and buffer for 'sockaddr_vm' and instead of it add new
> several fields (callbacks) to transports like dgram_get_cid(), dgram_get_port()? I agree, that in each transport
> specific callback we will have same copying logic by calling 'skb_copy_datagram_msg()' and filling address
> by using 'vsock_addr_init()', but in this case we don't need to update transports too much. For example HyperV
> still unchanged as it does not support SOCK_DGRAM. For VMCI You just need to add 'vsock_addr_init()' logic
> to it's dgram dequeue callback.
> 
> What do You think?
> 
> Thanks, Arseniy
> 

I tend to agree with your point here that adding this many callbacks is
not the big win in complexity reduction that we're hoping for.

I also agree with Stefano's assessment that having two near identical
implementations is not good either.

Hopefully having one simpler callback will bring the best of both
worlds?

Best,
Bobby

> > +
> > +		vsock_addr_init(vm_addr, cid, port);
> > +		msg->msg_namelen = sizeof(*vm_addr);
> > +	}
> > +	err = payload_len;
> > +
> > +out:
> > +	skb_free_datagram(&vsk->sk, skb);
> > +	return err;
> >  }
> >  EXPORT_SYMBOL_GPL(vsock_dgram_recvmsg);
> >  
> > diff --git a/net/vmw_vsock/hyperv_transport.c b/net/vmw_vsock/hyperv_transport.c
> > index 7cb1a9d2cdb4..ff6e87e25fa0 100644
> > --- a/net/vmw_vsock/hyperv_transport.c
> > +++ b/net/vmw_vsock/hyperv_transport.c
> > @@ -556,8 +556,17 @@ static int hvs_dgram_bind(struct vsock_sock *vsk, struct sockaddr_vm *addr)
> >  	return -EOPNOTSUPP;
> >  }
> >  
> > -static int hvs_dgram_dequeue(struct vsock_sock *vsk, struct msghdr *msg,
> > -			     size_t len, int flags)
> > +static int hvs_dgram_get_cid(struct sk_buff *skb, unsigned int *cid)
> > +{
> > +	return -EOPNOTSUPP;
> > +}
> > +
> > +static int hvs_dgram_get_port(struct sk_buff *skb, unsigned int *port)
> > +{
> > +	return -EOPNOTSUPP;
> > +}
> > +
> > +static int hvs_dgram_get_length(struct sk_buff *skb, size_t *len)
> >  {
> >  	return -EOPNOTSUPP;
> >  }
> > @@ -833,7 +842,9 @@ static struct vsock_transport hvs_transport = {
> >  	.shutdown                 = hvs_shutdown,
> >  
> >  	.dgram_bind               = hvs_dgram_bind,
> > -	.dgram_dequeue            = hvs_dgram_dequeue,
> > +	.dgram_get_cid		  = hvs_dgram_get_cid,
> > +	.dgram_get_port		  = hvs_dgram_get_port,
> > +	.dgram_get_length	  = hvs_dgram_get_length,
> >  	.dgram_enqueue            = hvs_dgram_enqueue,
> >  	.dgram_allow              = hvs_dgram_allow,
> >  
> > diff --git a/net/vmw_vsock/virtio_transport.c b/net/vmw_vsock/virtio_transport.c
> > index e95df847176b..5763cdf13804 100644
> > --- a/net/vmw_vsock/virtio_transport.c
> > +++ b/net/vmw_vsock/virtio_transport.c
> > @@ -429,9 +429,11 @@ static struct virtio_transport virtio_transport = {
> >  		.cancel_pkt               = virtio_transport_cancel_pkt,
> >  
> >  		.dgram_bind               = virtio_transport_dgram_bind,
> > -		.dgram_dequeue            = virtio_transport_dgram_dequeue,
> >  		.dgram_enqueue            = virtio_transport_dgram_enqueue,
> >  		.dgram_allow              = virtio_transport_dgram_allow,
> > +		.dgram_get_cid		  = virtio_transport_dgram_get_cid,
> > +		.dgram_get_port		  = virtio_transport_dgram_get_port,
> > +		.dgram_get_length	  = virtio_transport_dgram_get_length,
> >  
> >  		.stream_dequeue           = virtio_transport_stream_dequeue,
> >  		.stream_enqueue           = virtio_transport_stream_enqueue,
> > diff --git a/net/vmw_vsock/virtio_transport_common.c b/net/vmw_vsock/virtio_transport_common.c
> > index b769fc258931..e6903c719964 100644
> > --- a/net/vmw_vsock/virtio_transport_common.c
> > +++ b/net/vmw_vsock/virtio_transport_common.c
> > @@ -797,6 +797,24 @@ int virtio_transport_dgram_bind(struct vsock_sock *vsk,
> >  }
> >  EXPORT_SYMBOL_GPL(virtio_transport_dgram_bind);
> >  
> > +int virtio_transport_dgram_get_cid(struct sk_buff *skb, unsigned int *cid)
> > +{
> > +	return -EOPNOTSUPP;
> > +}
> > +EXPORT_SYMBOL_GPL(virtio_transport_dgram_get_cid);
> > +
> > +int virtio_transport_dgram_get_port(struct sk_buff *skb, unsigned int *port)
> > +{
> > +	return -EOPNOTSUPP;
> > +}
> > +EXPORT_SYMBOL_GPL(virtio_transport_dgram_get_port);
> > +
> > +int virtio_transport_dgram_get_length(struct sk_buff *skb, size_t *len)
> > +{
> > +	return -EOPNOTSUPP;
> > +}
> > +EXPORT_SYMBOL_GPL(virtio_transport_dgram_get_length);
> > +
> >  bool virtio_transport_dgram_allow(u32 cid, u32 port)
> >  {
> >  	return false;
> > diff --git a/net/vmw_vsock/vmci_transport.c b/net/vmw_vsock/vmci_transport.c
> > index b370070194fa..bbc63826bf48 100644
> > --- a/net/vmw_vsock/vmci_transport.c
> > +++ b/net/vmw_vsock/vmci_transport.c
> > @@ -1731,57 +1731,40 @@ static int vmci_transport_dgram_enqueue(
> >  	return err - sizeof(*dg);
> >  }
> >  
> > -static int vmci_transport_dgram_dequeue(struct vsock_sock *vsk,
> > -					struct msghdr *msg, size_t len,
> > -					int flags)
> > +static int vmci_transport_dgram_get_cid(struct sk_buff *skb, unsigned int *cid)
> >  {
> > -	int err;
> >  	struct vmci_datagram *dg;
> > -	size_t payload_len;
> > -	struct sk_buff *skb;
> >  
> > -	if (flags & MSG_OOB || flags & MSG_ERRQUEUE)
> > -		return -EOPNOTSUPP;
> > +	dg = (struct vmci_datagram *)skb->data;
> > +	if (!dg)
> > +		return -EINVAL;
> >  
> > -	/* Retrieve the head sk_buff from the socket's receive queue. */
> > -	err = 0;
> > -	skb = skb_recv_datagram(&vsk->sk, flags, &err);
> > -	if (!skb)
> > -		return err;
> > +	*cid = dg->src.context;
> > +	return 0;
> > +}
> > +
> > +static int vmci_transport_dgram_get_port(struct sk_buff *skb, unsigned int *port)
> > +{
> > +	struct vmci_datagram *dg;
> >  
> >  	dg = (struct vmci_datagram *)skb->data;
> >  	if (!dg)
> > -		/* err is 0, meaning we read zero bytes. */
> > -		goto out;
> > -
> > -	payload_len = dg->payload_size;
> > -	/* Ensure the sk_buff matches the payload size claimed in the packet. */
> > -	if (payload_len != skb->len - sizeof(*dg)) {
> > -		err = -EINVAL;
> > -		goto out;
> > -	}
> > +		return -EINVAL;
> >  
> > -	if (payload_len > len) {
> > -		payload_len = len;
> > -		msg->msg_flags |= MSG_TRUNC;
> > -	}
> > +	*port = dg->src.resource;
> > +	return 0;
> > +}
> >  
> > -	/* Place the datagram payload in the user's iovec. */
> > -	err = skb_copy_datagram_msg(skb, sizeof(*dg), msg, payload_len);
> > -	if (err)
> > -		goto out;
> > +static int vmci_transport_dgram_get_length(struct sk_buff *skb, size_t *len)
> > +{
> > +	struct vmci_datagram *dg;
> >  
> > -	if (msg->msg_name) {
> > -		/* Provide the address of the sender. */
> > -		DECLARE_SOCKADDR(struct sockaddr_vm *, vm_addr, msg->msg_name);
> > -		vsock_addr_init(vm_addr, dg->src.context, dg->src.resource);
> > -		msg->msg_namelen = sizeof(*vm_addr);
> > -	}
> > -	err = payload_len;
> > +	dg = (struct vmci_datagram *)skb->data;
> > +	if (!dg)
> > +		return -EINVAL;
> >  
> > -out:
> > -	skb_free_datagram(&vsk->sk, skb);
> > -	return err;
> > +	*len = dg->payload_size;
> > +	return 0;
> >  }
> >  
> >  static bool vmci_transport_dgram_allow(u32 cid, u32 port)
> > @@ -2040,9 +2023,12 @@ static struct vsock_transport vmci_transport = {
> >  	.release = vmci_transport_release,
> >  	.connect = vmci_transport_connect,
> >  	.dgram_bind = vmci_transport_dgram_bind,
> > -	.dgram_dequeue = vmci_transport_dgram_dequeue,
> >  	.dgram_enqueue = vmci_transport_dgram_enqueue,
> >  	.dgram_allow = vmci_transport_dgram_allow,
> > +	.dgram_get_cid = vmci_transport_dgram_get_cid,
> > +	.dgram_get_port = vmci_transport_dgram_get_port,
> > +	.dgram_get_length = vmci_transport_dgram_get_length,
> > +	.dgram_payload_offset = sizeof(struct vmci_datagram),
> >  	.stream_dequeue = vmci_transport_stream_dequeue,
> >  	.stream_enqueue = vmci_transport_stream_enqueue,
> >  	.stream_has_data = vmci_transport_stream_has_data,
> > diff --git a/net/vmw_vsock/vsock_loopback.c b/net/vmw_vsock/vsock_loopback.c
> > index 5c6360df1f31..2f3cabc79ee5 100644
> > --- a/net/vmw_vsock/vsock_loopback.c
> > +++ b/net/vmw_vsock/vsock_loopback.c
> > @@ -62,9 +62,11 @@ static struct virtio_transport loopback_transport = {
> >  		.cancel_pkt               = vsock_loopback_cancel_pkt,
> >  
> >  		.dgram_bind               = virtio_transport_dgram_bind,
> > -		.dgram_dequeue            = virtio_transport_dgram_dequeue,
> >  		.dgram_enqueue            = virtio_transport_dgram_enqueue,
> >  		.dgram_allow              = virtio_transport_dgram_allow,
> > +		.dgram_get_cid		  = virtio_transport_dgram_get_cid,
> > +		.dgram_get_port		  = virtio_transport_dgram_get_port,
> > +		.dgram_get_length	  = virtio_transport_dgram_get_length,
> >  
> >  		.stream_dequeue           = virtio_transport_stream_dequeue,
> >  		.stream_enqueue           = virtio_transport_stream_enqueue,
> > 

Powered by blists - more mailing lists