[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <1969749.1687511298@warthog.procyon.org.uk>
Date: Fri, 23 Jun 2023 10:08:18 +0100
From: David Howells <dhowells@...hat.com>
To: Jakub Kicinski <kuba@...nel.org>
Cc: dhowells@...hat.com, Eric Dumazet <edumazet@...gle.com>,
netdev@...r.kernel.org, Alexander Duyck <alexander.duyck@...il.com>,
"David S. Miller" <davem@...emloft.net>,
Paolo Abeni <pabeni@...hat.com>,
Willem de Bruijn <willemdebruijn.kernel@...il.com>,
David Ahern <dsahern@...nel.org>,
Matthew Wilcox <willy@...radead.org>, Jens Axboe <axboe@...nel.dk>,
linux-mm@...ck.org, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
Menglong Dong <imagedong@...cent.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH net-next v3 01/18] net: Copy slab data for sendmsg(MSG_SPLICE_PAGES)
Jakub Kicinski <kuba@...nel.org> wrote:
> If we can't reach instant agreement --
> can you strategically separate out the minimal set of changes required
> to just kill MSG_SENDPAGE_NOTLAST. IMHO it's worth getting that into
> 6.5.
Paolo Abeni <pabeni@...hat.com> wrote:
> Given all the above, and the late stage of the current devel cycle,
> would you consider slicing down this series to just kill
> MSG_SENDPAGE_NOTLAST, as Jakub suggested?
I could do that.
There is also another alternative. I could just push the sendpage wrappers up
the stack into the higher-level callers. Basically this:
int udp_sendpage(struct sock *sk, struct page *page, int offset,
size_t size, int flags)
{
struct bio_vec bvec;
struct msghdr msg = { .msg_flags = flags | MSG_SPLICE_PAGES };
if (flags & MSG_SENDPAGE_NOTLAST)
msg.msg_flags |= MSG_MORE;
bvec_set_page(&bvec, page, size, offset);
iov_iter_bvec(&msg.msg_iter, ITER_SOURCE, &bvec, 1, size);
return udp_sendmsg(sk, &msg, size);
}
and kill off sendpage and MSG_SENDPAGE_NOTLAST.
David
Powered by blists - more mailing lists