netdev - Re: [PATCH v2] net: cpsw: fix obtaining mac address for am3517

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Date: Sat, 24 Jun 2023 16:55:30 +0200
From: Simon Horman <simon.horman@...igine.com>
To: Andrew Lunn <andrew@...n.ch>
Cc: Jeroen Hofstee <jhofstee@...tronenergy.com>,
	Måns Rullgård <mans@...sr.com>,
	Tony Lindgren <tony@...mide.com>, netdev@...r.kernel.org,
	Mugunthan V N <mugunthanvnm@...com>,
	Grygorii Strashko <grygorii.strashko@...com>,
	"open list:TI ETHERNET SWITCH DRIVER (CPSW)" <linux-omap@...r.kernel.org>,
	open list <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v2] net: cpsw: fix obtaining mac address for am3517

On Fri, Jun 23, 2023 at 11:41:10PM +0200, Andrew Lunn wrote:
> > > I feel like I am missing something here.
> > 
> > That is a weird response, you feel like something is missing
> 
> There is. The patch.
> 
> Maintainers have a slightly better memory than a goldfish, but given
> the high volume of patches, we don't remember threads from 2016. Also,
> all our infrastructure has limited memory, this patch is not in lore,
> and it is not in patchworks. So in terms of getting merged, it does
> not exist.
> 
> We do however recommend that if a patch has not been merged within 2
> weeks, it is rebased, any Acked-by: etc tags are added and the patch
> reposted.

Thanks Andrew, that is also my position.

A ping for a multi-year old patch is unusual (for me).
I was wondering if there was a back story. I guess not.