| lists.openwall.net | lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC | |
|
Open Source and information security mailing list archives
| ||
|
Message-ID: <1687659046.7482243-2-xuanzhuo@linux.alibaba.com>
Date: Sun, 25 Jun 2023 10:10:46 +0800
From: Xuan Zhuo <xuanzhuo@...ux.alibaba.com>
To: "Michael S. Tsirkin" <mst@...hat.com>
Cc: virtualization@...ts.linux-foundation.org,
Jason Wang <jasowang@...hat.com>,
"David S. Miller" <davem@...emloft.net>,
Eric Dumazet <edumazet@...gle.com>,
Jakub Kicinski <kuba@...nel.org>,
Paolo Abeni <pabeni@...hat.com>,
Alexei Starovoitov <ast@...nel.org>,
Daniel Borkmann <daniel@...earbox.net>,
Jesper Dangaard Brouer <hawk@...nel.org>,
John Fastabend <john.fastabend@...il.com>,
netdev@...r.kernel.org,
bpf@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH vhost v10 05/10] virtio_ring: split-detach: support return dma info to driver
On Thu, 22 Jun 2023 15:36:41 -0400, "Michael S. Tsirkin" <mst@...hat.com> wrote:
> On Fri, Jun 02, 2023 at 05:22:01PM +0800, Xuan Zhuo wrote:
> > Under the premapped mode, the driver needs to unmap the DMA address
> > after receiving the buffer. The virtio core records the DMA address,
> > so the driver needs a way to get the dma info from the virtio core.
> >
> > A straightforward approach is to pass an array to the virtio core when
> > calling virtqueue_get_buf(). However, it is not feasible when there are
> > multiple DMA addresses in the descriptor chain, and the array size is
> > unknown.
> >
> > To solve this problem, a helper be introduced. After calling
> > virtqueue_get_buf(), the driver can call the helper to
> > retrieve a dma info. If the helper function returns -EAGAIN, it means
> > that there are more DMA addresses to be processed, and the driver should
> > call the helper function again. To keep track of the current position in
> > the chain, a cursor must be passed to the helper function, which is
> > initialized by virtqueue_get_buf().
> >
> > Some processes are done inside this helper, so this helper MUST be
> > called under the premapped mode.
> >
> > Signed-off-by: Xuan Zhuo <xuanzhuo@...ux.alibaba.com>
> > ---
> > drivers/virtio/virtio_ring.c | 118 ++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++---
> > include/linux/virtio.h | 11 ++++
> > 2 files changed, 119 insertions(+), 10 deletions(-)
> >
> > diff --git a/drivers/virtio/virtio_ring.c b/drivers/virtio/virtio_ring.c
> > index dc109fbc05a5..cdc4349f6066 100644
> > --- a/drivers/virtio/virtio_ring.c
> > +++ b/drivers/virtio/virtio_ring.c
> > @@ -754,8 +754,95 @@ static bool virtqueue_kick_prepare_split(struct virtqueue *_vq)
> > return needs_kick;
> > }
> >
> > -static void detach_buf_split(struct vring_virtqueue *vq, unsigned int head,
> > - void **ctx)
> > +static void detach_cursor_init_split(struct vring_virtqueue *vq,
> > + struct virtqueue_detach_cursor *cursor, u16 head)
> > +{
> > + struct vring_desc_extra *extra;
> > +
> > + extra = &vq->split.desc_extra[head];
> > +
> > + /* Clear data ptr. */
> > + vq->split.desc_state[head].data = NULL;
> > +
> > + cursor->head = head;
> > + cursor->done = 0;
> > +
> > + if (extra->flags & VRING_DESC_F_INDIRECT) {
> > + cursor->num = extra->len / sizeof(struct vring_desc);
> > + cursor->indirect = true;
> > + cursor->pos = 0;
> > +
> > + vring_unmap_one_split(vq, head);
> > +
> > + extra->next = vq->free_head;
> > +
> > + vq->free_head = head;
> > +
> > + /* Plus final descriptor */
> > + vq->vq.num_free++;
> > +
> > + } else {
> > + cursor->indirect = false;
> > + cursor->pos = head;
> > + }
> > +}
> > +
> > +static int virtqueue_detach_split(struct virtqueue *_vq, struct virtqueue_detach_cursor *cursor,
> > + dma_addr_t *addr, u32 *len, enum dma_data_direction *dir)
> > +{
>
> I don't get it. This is generic split vq code?
NO. This is the api for split vq when the address is mapped by the driver.
> Why is it unconditionally
> wasting time with cursors etc? Poking at split.desc_extra when not
> necessary is also not really nice, will cause lots of cache misses.
virtqueue_get_buf_ctx_split() is the generic code.
I just add the checking of vq->premapped.
>
> And it looks like we duplicated a bunch of logic?
Yes.
The detach_buf_split() is the origin logic.
But now, the driver needs to get the dma info of every desc, so
I break the loop of the detach_buf_split().
But, the logic is simple, so I think it is ok.
virtqueue_detach_split() return the dma info of every desc.
detach_cursor_init_split() init the cursor inside virtqueue_get_buf_ctx_split().
>
>
> > + struct vring_virtqueue *vq = to_vvq(_vq);
> > + __virtio16 nextflag = cpu_to_virtio16(vq->vq.vdev, VRING_DESC_F_NEXT);
> > + int rc = -EAGAIN;
> > +
> > + if (unlikely(cursor->done))
> > + return -EINVAL;
> > +
> > + if (!cursor->indirect) {
> > + struct vring_desc_extra *extra;
> > + unsigned int i;
> > +
> > + i = cursor->pos;
> > +
> > + extra = &vq->split.desc_extra[i];
> > +
> > + if (vq->split.vring.desc[i].flags & nextflag) {
> > + cursor->pos = extra->next;
> > + } else {
> > + extra->next = vq->free_head;
> > + vq->free_head = cursor->head;
> > + cursor->done = true;
> > + rc = 0;
> > + }
> > +
> > + *addr = extra->addr;
> > + *len = extra->len;
> > + *dir = (extra->flags & VRING_DESC_F_WRITE) ? DMA_FROM_DEVICE : DMA_TO_DEVICE;
> > +
> > + vq->vq.num_free++;
> > +
> > + } else {
> > + struct vring_desc *indir_desc, *desc;
> > + u16 flags;
> > +
> > + indir_desc = vq->split.desc_state[cursor->head].indir_desc;
> > + desc = &indir_desc[cursor->pos];
> > +
> > + flags = virtio16_to_cpu(vq->vq.vdev, desc->flags);
> > + *addr = virtio64_to_cpu(vq->vq.vdev, desc->addr);
> > + *len = virtio32_to_cpu(vq->vq.vdev, desc->len);
> > + *dir = (flags & VRING_DESC_F_WRITE) ? DMA_FROM_DEVICE : DMA_TO_DEVICE;
> > +
> > + if (++cursor->pos == cursor->num) {
> > + kfree(indir_desc);
> > + cursor->done = true;
> > + return 0;
> > + }
> > + }
> > +
> > + return rc;
> > +}
> > +
> > +static void detach_buf_split(struct vring_virtqueue *vq, unsigned int head)
> > {
> > unsigned int i, j;
> > __virtio16 nextflag = cpu_to_virtio16(vq->vq.vdev, VRING_DESC_F_NEXT);
> > @@ -799,8 +886,6 @@ static void detach_buf_split(struct vring_virtqueue *vq, unsigned int head,
> >
> > kfree(indir_desc);
> > vq->split.desc_state[head].indir_desc = NULL;
> > - } else if (ctx) {
> > - *ctx = vq->split.desc_state[head].indir_desc;
> > }
> > }
> >
> > @@ -812,7 +897,8 @@ static bool more_used_split(const struct vring_virtqueue *vq)
> >
> > static void *virtqueue_get_buf_ctx_split(struct virtqueue *_vq,
> > unsigned int *len,
> > - void **ctx)
> > + void **ctx,
> > + struct virtqueue_detach_cursor *cursor)
> > {
> > struct vring_virtqueue *vq = to_vvq(_vq);
> > void *ret;
> > @@ -852,7 +938,15 @@ static void *virtqueue_get_buf_ctx_split(struct virtqueue *_vq,
> >
> > /* detach_buf_split clears data, so grab it now. */
> > ret = vq->split.desc_state[i].data;
> > - detach_buf_split(vq, i, ctx);
> > +
> > + if (!vq->indirect && ctx)
> > + *ctx = vq->split.desc_state[i].indir_desc;
> > +
> > + if (vq->premapped)
> > + detach_cursor_init_split(vq, cursor, i);
> > + else
> > + detach_buf_split(vq, i);
> > +
> > vq->last_used_idx++;
> > /* If we expect an interrupt for the next entry, tell host
> > * by writing event index and flush out the write before
> > @@ -961,7 +1055,8 @@ static bool virtqueue_enable_cb_delayed_split(struct virtqueue *_vq)
> > return true;
> > }
> >
> > -static void *virtqueue_detach_unused_buf_split(struct virtqueue *_vq)
> > +static void *virtqueue_detach_unused_buf_split(struct virtqueue *_vq,
> > + struct virtqueue_detach_cursor *cursor)
> > {
> > struct vring_virtqueue *vq = to_vvq(_vq);
> > unsigned int i;
> > @@ -974,7 +1069,10 @@ static void *virtqueue_detach_unused_buf_split(struct virtqueue *_vq)
> > continue;
> > /* detach_buf_split clears data, so grab it now. */
> > buf = vq->split.desc_state[i].data;
> > - detach_buf_split(vq, i, NULL);
> > + if (vq->premapped)
> > + detach_cursor_init_split(vq, cursor, i);
> > + else
> > + detach_buf_split(vq, i);
> > vq->split.avail_idx_shadow--;
> > vq->split.vring.avail->idx = cpu_to_virtio16(_vq->vdev,
> > vq->split.avail_idx_shadow);
> > @@ -2361,7 +2459,7 @@ void *virtqueue_get_buf_ctx(struct virtqueue *_vq, unsigned int *len,
> > struct vring_virtqueue *vq = to_vvq(_vq);
> >
> > return vq->packed_ring ? virtqueue_get_buf_ctx_packed(_vq, len, ctx) :
> > - virtqueue_get_buf_ctx_split(_vq, len, ctx);
> > + virtqueue_get_buf_ctx_split(_vq, len, ctx, NULL);
> > }
> > EXPORT_SYMBOL_GPL(virtqueue_get_buf_ctx);
> >
> > @@ -2493,7 +2591,7 @@ void *virtqueue_detach_unused_buf(struct virtqueue *_vq)
> > struct vring_virtqueue *vq = to_vvq(_vq);
> >
> > return vq->packed_ring ? virtqueue_detach_unused_buf_packed(_vq) :
> > - virtqueue_detach_unused_buf_split(_vq);
> > + virtqueue_detach_unused_buf_split(_vq, NULL);
> > }
> > EXPORT_SYMBOL_GPL(virtqueue_detach_unused_buf);
> >
> > diff --git a/include/linux/virtio.h b/include/linux/virtio.h
> > index 1fc0e1023bd4..eb4a4e4329aa 100644
> > --- a/include/linux/virtio.h
> > +++ b/include/linux/virtio.h
> > @@ -38,6 +38,17 @@ struct virtqueue {
> > void *priv;
> > };
> >
> > +struct virtqueue_detach_cursor {
> > + unsigned indirect:1;
> > + unsigned done:1;
> > + unsigned hole:14;
> > +
> > + /* for split head */
> > + unsigned head:16;
> > + unsigned num:16;
> > + unsigned pos:16;
> > +};
> > +
>
> is cursor ever stored somewhere? If not don't use bitfields,
> they cause many gcc versions to generate atrocious code.
OK.
Thanks.
>
>
> > int virtqueue_add_outbuf(struct virtqueue *vq,
> > struct scatterlist sg[], unsigned int num,
> > void *data,
> > --
> > 2.32.0.3.g01195cf9f
>
Powered by blists - more mailing lists