[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <alpine.DEB.2.22.394.2306252221310.3022@hadrien>
Date: Sun, 25 Jun 2023 22:25:11 +0200 (CEST)
From: Julia Lawall <julia.lawall@...ia.fr>
To: Christophe JAILLET <christophe.jaillet@...adoo.fr>
cc: Jakub Kicinski <kuba@...nel.org>, Julia Lawall <Julia.Lawall@...ia.fr>,
Veerasenareddy Burru <vburru@...vell.com>, keescook@...omium.org,
kernel-janitors@...r.kernel.org, Abhijit Ayarekar <aayarekar@...vell.com>,
"David S. Miller" <davem@...emloft.net>,
Eric Dumazet <edumazet@...gle.com>, Paolo Abeni <pabeni@...hat.com>,
netdev@...r.kernel.org, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, corbet@....net
Subject: Re: [PATCH 02/26] octeon_ep: use array_size
On Sun, 25 Jun 2023, Christophe JAILLET wrote:
> Le 25/06/2023 à 00:28, Jakub Kicinski a écrit :
> > On Fri, 23 Jun 2023 23:14:33 +0200 Julia Lawall wrote:
> > > - oq->buff_info = vzalloc(oq->max_count * OCTEP_OQ_RECVBUF_SIZE);
> > > + oq->buff_info = vzalloc(array_size(oq->max_count,
> > > OCTEP_OQ_RECVBUF_SIZE));
> >
> > vcalloc seems to exist, is there a reason array_size() is preferred?
>
> Hi,
>
> just for your information, I've just sent [1].
>
> CJ
>
> [1]:
> https://lore.kernel.org/all/3484e46180dd2cf05d993ff1a78b481bc2ad1f71.1687723931.git.christophe.jaillet@wanadoo.fr/
For some reason, I have only received Christophe's mail, not Jakub's...
In any case, thanks for pointing out the existence of these functions. I
just redid what Kees did in 2018, when I guess these functions didn't
exist. I will look more carefully to see what functions are now available
and resend the whole thing.
Thanks!
julia
Powered by blists - more mailing lists