netdev - Re: [PATCH net-next v5 03/16] ceph: Use sendmsg(MSG_SPLICE

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Date: Mon, 26 Jun 2023 17:41:03 +0200
From: Ilya Dryomov <idryomov@...il.com>
To: David Howells <dhowells@...hat.com>
Cc: netdev@...r.kernel.org, Alexander Duyck <alexander.duyck@...il.com>, 
	"David S. Miller" <davem@...emloft.net>, Eric Dumazet <edumazet@...gle.com>, 
	Jakub Kicinski <kuba@...nel.org>, Paolo Abeni <pabeni@...hat.com>, 
	Willem de Bruijn <willemdebruijn.kernel@...il.com>, David Ahern <dsahern@...nel.org>, 
	Matthew Wilcox <willy@...radead.org>, Jens Axboe <axboe@...nel.dk>, linux-mm@...ck.org, 
	linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, Xiubo Li <xiubli@...hat.com>, 
	Jeff Layton <jlayton@...nel.org>, ceph-devel@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH net-next v5 03/16] ceph: Use sendmsg(MSG_SPLICE_PAGES)
 rather than sendpage

On Mon, Jun 26, 2023 at 4:00 PM David Howells <dhowells@...hat.com> wrote:
>
> Ilya Dryomov <idryomov@...il.com> wrote:
>
> > Same here...  I would suggest that you keep ceph_tcp_sendpage() function
> > and make only minimal modifications to avoid regressions.
>
> This is now committed to net-next.

This needs to be dropped from linux-next because both this and
especially the other (net/ceph/messenger_v2.c) patch introduce
regressions.

> I can bring ceph_tcp_sendpage() back into
> existence or fix it in place for now if you have a preference.

I already mentioned that I would prefer if ceph_tcp_sendpage() was
brought back into existence.

>
> Note that I'm working on patches to rework the libceph transmission path so
> that it isn't dealing with transmitting a single page at a time, but it's not
> ready yet.

That is a worthwhile improvement now that sock_sendmsg() can take
advantage of multiple pages!  It would be pretty invasive though so
I think ceph_tcp_sendpage() is better to remain in place until then.

Thanks,

                Ilya