netdev - Re: [Intel-wired-lan] bug with rx-udp-gro-forwarding offloading?

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <0a040331995c072c56fce58794848f5e9853c44f.camel@redhat.com>
Date: Tue, 27 Jun 2023 11:19:05 +0200
From: Paolo Abeni <pabeni@...hat.com>
To: Ian Kumlien <ian.kumlien@...il.com>
Cc: Alexander Lobakin <aleksander.lobakin@...el.com>, intel-wired-lan
 <intel-wired-lan@...ts.osuosl.org>, Jakub Kicinski <kuba@...nel.org>, Eric
 Dumazet <edumazet@...gle.com>, "netdev@...r.kernel.org"
 <netdev@...r.kernel.org>,  "linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org"
 <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: [Intel-wired-lan] bug with rx-udp-gro-forwarding offloading?

On Mon, 2023-06-26 at 20:59 +0200, Ian Kumlien wrote:
> On Mon, Jun 26, 2023 at 8:20 PM Ian Kumlien <ian.kumlien@...il.com> wrote:
> > 
> > Nevermind, I think I found it, I will loop this thing until I have a
> > proper trace....
> 
> Still some question marks, but much better

Thanks!
> 
> cat bug.txt | ./scripts/decode_stacktrace.sh vmlinux
> [   62.624003] BUG: kernel NULL pointer dereference, address: 00000000000000c0
> [   62.631083] #PF: supervisor read access in kernel mode
> [   62.636312] #PF: error_code(0x0000) - not-present page
> [   62.641541] PGD 0 P4D 0
> [   62.644174] Oops: 0000 [#1] PREEMPT SMP NOPTI
> [   62.648629] CPU: 1 PID: 913 Comm: napi/eno2-79 Not tainted 6.4.0 #364
> [   62.655162] Hardware name: Supermicro Super Server/A2SDi-12C-HLN4F,
> BIOS 1.7a 10/13/2022
> [   62.663344] RIP: 0010:__udp_gso_segment
> (./include/linux/skbuff.h:2858 ./include/linux/udp.h:23
> net/ipv4/udp_offload.c:228 net/ipv4/udp_offload.c:261
> net/ipv4/udp_offload.c:277)

So it's faulting here:

static struct sk_buff *__udpv4_gso_segment_list_csum(struct sk_buff *segs)
{
        struct sk_buff *seg;
        struct udphdr *uh, *uh2;
        struct iphdr *iph, *iph2;

        seg = segs;
        uh = udp_hdr(seg);
        iph = ip_hdr(seg);

        if ((udp_hdr(seg)->dest == udp_hdr(seg->next)->dest) &&
        // ^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^

The GSO segment has been assembled by skb_gro_receive_list()
I guess seg->next is NULL, which is somewhat unexpected as
napi_gro_complete() clears the gso_size when sending up the stack a
single frame.

On the flip side, AFAICS, nothing prevents the stack from changing the
aggregated packet layout (e.g. pulling data and/or linearizing the
skb).

In any case this looks more related to rx-gro-list then rx-udp-gro-
forwarding. I understand you have both feature enabled in your env?

Side questions: do you have any non trivial nf/br filter rule?

The following could possibly validate the above and avoid the issue,
but it's a bit papering over it. Could you please try it in your env?

Thanks!

Paolo
---
diff --git a/net/core/skbuff.c b/net/core/skbuff.c
index 6c5915efbc17..75531686bfdf 100644
--- a/net/core/skbuff.c
+++ b/net/core/skbuff.c
@@ -4319,6 +4319,9 @@ struct sk_buff *skb_segment_list(struct sk_buff *skb,

 	skb->prev = tail;

+	if (WARN_ON_ONCE(!skb->next))
+		goto err_linearize;
+
 	if (skb_needs_linearize(skb, features) &&
 	    __skb_linearize(skb))
 		goto err_linearize;