lists.openwall.net   lists  /  announce  owl-users  owl-dev  john-users  john-dev  passwdqc-users  yescrypt  popa3d-users  /  oss-security  kernel-hardening  musl  sabotage  tlsify  passwords  /  crypt-dev  xvendor  /  Bugtraq  Full-Disclosure  linux-kernel  linux-netdev  linux-ext4  linux-hardening  linux-cve-announce  PHC 
Open Source and information security mailing list archives
 
Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.
[<prev] [next>] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-Id: <20230627105209.15163-1-dg573847474@gmail.com>
Date: Tue, 27 Jun 2023 10:52:09 +0000
From: Chengfeng Ye <dg573847474@...il.com>
To: davem@...emloft.net,
	edumazet@...gle.com,
	kuba@...nel.org,
	pabeni@...hat.com
Cc: netdev@...r.kernel.org,
	linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
	Chengfeng Ye <dg573847474@...il.com>
Subject: [PATCH] net/802/garp: fix potential deadlock on &app->lock

As &app->lock is also acquired by the timer garp_join_timer() which
which executes under soft-irq context, code executing under process
context should disable irq before acquiring the lock, otherwise
deadlock could happen if the process context hold the lock then
preempt by the interruption.

garp_pdu_rcv() is one such function that acquires &app->lock, but I
am not sure whether it is called with irq disable outside thus the
patch could be false.

Possible deadlock scenario:
garp_pdu_rcv()
    -> spin_lock(&app->lock)
        <timer interrupt>
        -> garp_join_timer()
        -> spin_lock(&app->lock)

This flaw was found using an experimental static analysis tool we are
developing for irq-related deadlock.

The tentative patch fix the potential deadlock by spin_lock_irqsave(),
or it should be fixed with spin_lock_bh() if it is a real bug? I am
not very sure.

Signed-off-by: Chengfeng Ye <dg573847474@...il.com>
---
 net/802/garp.c | 5 +++--
 1 file changed, 3 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-)

diff --git a/net/802/garp.c b/net/802/garp.c
index ab24b21fbb49..acc6f2f847a6 100644
--- a/net/802/garp.c
+++ b/net/802/garp.c
@@ -515,6 +515,7 @@ static void garp_pdu_rcv(const struct stp_proto *proto, struct sk_buff *skb,
 	struct garp_port *port;
 	struct garp_applicant *app;
 	const struct garp_pdu_hdr *gp;
+	unsigned long flags;
 
 	port = rcu_dereference(dev->garp_port);
 	if (!port)
@@ -530,14 +531,14 @@ static void garp_pdu_rcv(const struct stp_proto *proto, struct sk_buff *skb,
 		goto err;
 	skb_pull(skb, sizeof(*gp));
 
-	spin_lock(&app->lock);
+	spin_lock_irqsave(&app->lock, flags);
 	while (skb->len > 0) {
 		if (garp_pdu_parse_msg(app, skb) < 0)
 			break;
 		if (garp_pdu_parse_end_mark(skb) < 0)
 			break;
 	}
-	spin_unlock(&app->lock);
+	spin_unlock_irqrestore(&app->lock, flags);
 err:
 	kfree_skb(skb);
 }
-- 
2.17.1


Powered by blists - more mailing lists

Powered by Openwall GNU/*/Linux Powered by OpenVZ