netdev - Re: [PATCH v1 net-next] Revert "af_unix: Call scm_recv() only after scm_set

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Date: Tue, 27 Jun 2023 10:03:24 -0700
From: Kuniyuki Iwashima <kuniyu@...zon.com>
To: <kuba@...nel.org>
CC: <davem@...emloft.net>, <edumazet@...gle.com>, <konradybcio@...nel.org>,
	<kuni1840@...il.com>, <kuniyu@...zon.com>, <netdev@...r.kernel.org>,
	<pabeni@...hat.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v1 net-next] Revert "af_unix: Call scm_recv() only after scm_set_cred()."

From: Jakub Kicinski <kuba@...nel.org>
Date: Tue, 27 Jun 2023 09:42:45 -0700
> On Mon, 26 Jun 2023 13:58:37 -0700 Kuniyuki Iwashima wrote:
> > Regarding to the warning of SO_PASSPIDFD, I'll post another patch to
> > suppress it by skipping SCM_PIDFD if scm->pid == NULL in scm_pidfd_recv().
> 
> > Sorry for bothering, but can this make it to the v6.5 train to
> > avoid regression reports ?
> 
> I'm merging the trees now, could you send the follow up soon?
> Could you respin Alexander's fix for me as well (make it a two patch
> series?):
> https://lore.kernel.org/all/20230626215951.563715-1-aleksandr.mikhalitsyn@canonical.com/
> It trivially conflicts after applying this patch.

I see.  I'll post 2 patches soon.

Thank you, Jakub!