[<prev] [next>] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-Id: <20230628030506.2213-1-hengqi@linux.alibaba.com>
Date: Wed, 28 Jun 2023 11:05:04 +0800
From: Heng Qi <hengqi@...ux.alibaba.com>
To: netdev@...r.kernel.org,
bpf@...r.kernel.org,
"Michael S . Tsirkin" <mst@...hat.com>,
Jason Wang <jasowang@...hat.com>
Cc: "David S . Miller" <davem@...emloft.net>,
Eric Dumazet <edumazet@...gle.com>,
Jakub Kicinski <kuba@...nel.org>,
Paolo Abeni <pabeni@...hat.com>,
Alexei Starovoitov <ast@...nel.org>,
Daniel Borkmann <daniel@...earbox.net>,
Jesper Dangaard Brouer <hawk@...nel.org>,
John Fastabend <john.fastabend@...il.com>,
Xuan Zhuo <xuanzhuo@...ux.alibaba.com>
Subject: [PATCH net-next v4 0/2] virtio-net: avoid conflicts between XDP and GUEST_CSUM
virtio-net needs to clear the VIRTIO_NET_F_GUEST_CSUM feature when
loading XDP. The main reason for doing this is that received packets
marked with VIRTIO_NET_HDR_F_NEEDS_CSUM are not compatible with
XDP programs, that is, we cannot guarantee that the csum_{start, offset}
fields are correct after XDP processing.
There is also an existing problem, in the same host vm-vm (eg
[vm]<->[ovs vhost-user]<->[vm]) scenario, loading XDP will cause packet loss.
To solve the above problems, we have discussed in the [1] proposal, and
now try to solve it through the method of reprobing fields suggested
by Jason.
[1] https://lists.oasis-open.org/archives/virtio-dev/202305/msg00318.html
---
v3->v4:
- Rewrite some comments for patch [1/2].
v2->v3:
- Use skb_checksum_setup() instead of virtnet_flow_dissect_udp_tcp(). @Jason Wang
v1->v2:
- Squash v1's patch [1/4] and patch [2/4] into v2's patch [1/3]. @Michael S. Tsirkin
- Some minor modifications.
Heng Qi (2):
virtio-net: support coexistence of XDP and GUEST_CSUM
virtio-net: remove GUEST_CSUM check for XDP
drivers/net/virtio_net.c | 86 ++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++--------
1 file changed, 70 insertions(+), 16 deletions(-)
--
2.19.1.6.gb485710b
Powered by blists - more mailing lists