netdev - Re: [PATCH net 2/2] net: dsa: sja1105: always enable the send

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <20230630165300.jmy7duyrqj3gzjmp@skbuf>
Date: Fri, 30 Jun 2023 19:53:00 +0300
From: Vladimir Oltean <vladimir.oltean@....com>
To: Simon Horman <simon.horman@...igine.com>
Cc: netdev@...r.kernel.org, Andrew Lunn <andrew@...n.ch>,
	Florian Fainelli <f.fainelli@...il.com>,
	"David S. Miller" <davem@...emloft.net>,
	Eric Dumazet <edumazet@...gle.com>,
	Jakub Kicinski <kuba@...nel.org>, Paolo Abeni <pabeni@...hat.com>,
	linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH net 2/2] net: dsa: sja1105: always enable the send_meta
 options

Hi Simon,

On Fri, Jun 30, 2023 at 03:35:23PM +0200, Simon Horman wrote:
> Hi Vladimir,
> 
> this patch isn't that big, so I'm ok with it.  But it also isn't that
> small, so I'd just like to mention that a different approach might be a
> small patch that enables meta frame generation unconditionally, as a fix.
> And then, later, some cleanup, which seems to comprise most of this patch.
> 
> I do admit that I didn't try this. So it might not be sensible.  And as I
> said, I am ok with this patch. But I did think it was worth mentioning.
> 
> Reviewed-by: Simon Horman <simon.horman@...igine.com>
> 
> ...

Thanks for the feedback.

You're saying that it's preferable to leave sja1105_rxtstamp_set_state()
and sja1105_rxtstamp_get_state() where they are, accessible through
tagger_data->rxtstamp_set_state() and tagger_data->rxtstamp_get_state(),
but to only call tagger_data->rxtstamp_set_state() once, statically with
"true", and to never call tagger_data->rxtstamp_get_state()?

I probably could, but I'd have to delay the tagger_data->rxtstamp_set_state()
call until sja1105_connect_tag_protocol(); it's not going to be available
earlier. And this is going to be just filler code that I will then delete
as soon as net-next reopens.